[Solo] "False statement" submitted by lawyer Jung Jun-young to police ...

From now on, I will concentrate on the allegations of police involvement with entertainers. The police, who was investigating the case of Chung Joon-young in 2016, tried to eliminate Jung's cell phone repair materials, which is the most important evidence of the case. We told him yesterday that he had done this by himself.


<Anchor>

From now on, I will concentrate on the allegations of police involvement with entertainers. We were told yesterday (13th) that the police who was investigating the case of Chung Jun-young in 2016 tried to eliminate the most important evidence of Jung's cell phone repair data. However, I doubt whether the police would have done it alone I will. So, to our end, the Panda team did the coverage, and not only the police but also the lawyer of Chung Joon-young revealed the circumstances that played a lot of roles at that time to hide the evidence.

It is the sole report of Kim Ji-sung reporter.

<Reporter>

Singer Jung Joon-young was notified of the summons after being accused of illegal shooting for a woman he knew in August 2016.

Two days before the police attendance, Chung left his cell phone to a private forensic company.

For this reason, Chung did not submit his cell phone during the police investigation.

[Police officer in charge of Chung Jun Young's case in 2016: Whether it is advantageous or disadvantageous, first checking for defendant defense, we tried to seize it at that time, but we could not confiscate it. For the defendant's defense, I first check to see if there is a video, so I left it.

Even though it's urgent to get a cell phone in an illegal shooting investigation, it's time to cover up the evidence.

After completing the police recall investigation, Jung said the complainant did not need to proceed further because he dropped the charges.

I even asked for a certificate to be made as if forensics were impossible.

In addition to the police, I asked for confirmation of non-restoration.

[Police officer in charge of Chung Jun-yeong case in 2016: The machine is old and old, so I can not restore the data.

However, the company does not have forensics, and the staff member is on holiday, so ask them to wait two or three days.

[Forensic side: The person in charge went on vacation, the person in charge. It will come on Thursday.]

When the forensic company did not write the confirmation, Jung's lawyer submitted a written statement to the police.

As a result of the SBS coverage, the attorney 's opinion written by the police stated that "I received a reply from the company that it is impossible to restore the mobile phone, and that the mobile phone is lost or lost so it can not be submitted.

However, the company repeatedly confirmed that it had never replied that it was impossible to restore it.

[Jung, Jung-hyun / Reporter: I did not respond to the request to destroy the evidence and did not issue any kind of confirmation to it, but it is a very serious problem that the documents have been ascertained as confirmed.]

Jung's attorney's statement is falsely decorated.

The police sent the case to prosecution and attached a statement of attorney Jung Jun-young.

Eventually, the incident ended without charge, without any forensic results.

At that time, the lawyer was reportedly accompanied by a police recall investigation by Chung Jun-young today.

[Huh Yoon / Korean Attorney Association spokesperson: If this attorney actually submitted the forgery of the confirmation itself, this may also constitute a crime of forgery and an offense. You can discipline under the law ... .]

To the end, the Panda team contacted Chung several times to hear the counter-argument, but could not reach them.

(Video coverage: Chang, Hyun Cho, video editing: Jong Woo Kim, VJ: Kim Junho)

ref: sbskr