<Anchor>

In a lawsuit filed against Japanese war criminals by victims of forced labor in Japan, yesterday (25th) reported that the trial court of the court administration revealed the situation. By the way, a judge who worked as a trial researcher at the time of the Supreme Court's delayed trial puts a post on Facebook to support this suspicion. I heard that the trial was supposed to be abolished because of the abolition of the victims, and the Supreme Court judge was concerned about the diplomatic relations between Korea and Japan.

First, Rep. Lim Chong-jong will tell you.

<Reporter>

Judge Lee Mo, a former Supreme Court justice researcher, wrote on Facebook today about the forced trial.

After the Supreme Court ruled that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the victim in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court in 2012, the Supreme Court judge has worked as a Supreme Court justice researcher when the case was again pending in the Supreme Court.

The judge wrote in a letter to the court that a trial researcher had decided to abandon the ruling after he wrote a report citing the ruling of the Supreme Court in 2012, which acknowledged responsibility for the war crimes corporations.

Destroying a sentence means making a ruling that denies previous rulings.

The judge also wrote that a Supreme Court judge said the ruling brought about a major catastrophe in relations between Korea and Japan.

If this is true, this can be interpreted as the context in which the contents of the court documents appear to have been tried by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

The judge explained that the judge said that it was considered not only to destroy but also to approve the ruling.

He also claimed that he was a personal suspicion that he was not part of a group of researchers dealing with the case and that he had mistakenly written it.

(Image editing: Jung Sung Hoon)