As usual, the 2022 FIFA World Cup matches in Qatar, Morocco's matches against Canada, and Belgium with Croatia witnessed several arbitration cases, which we will discuss with explanation and analysis.
The first case was the cancellation of the referee (after returning to video technology and semi-automatic offside) for a goal scored by Morocco in stoppage time for the first half, when the result was the Atlas Lions advanced 2-1.
Some questioned the decision.
Because they looked at the first part of the case, when Hakim Ziyech executed the direct free kick from the right, and no Moroccan player was in an offside position, but the mistake was in the second part when Youssef Al-Nusairi aimed the rebound ball at him inside the goal, as his colleague was in an offside position. , and in the path of the ball in front of the Canadian goalkeeper, which necessitates the calculation of offside, and the situation is easy and clear;
So the judges' decision was correct.
🧐 What is the reason for canceling Morocco's third goal?
Subscribe now 👇
🔗 https://t.co/DjYUE8GiM1
📱 https://t.co/alkogGtHdW #Qatar2022 |
#World_Cup_Qatar_2022 |
#Canada_Morocco #WorldCupQatar2022 |
#Qatar2022 |
#FIFAWorldCup pic.twitter.com/yBPslacJZt
- beIN SPORTS (@beINSPORTS) December 1, 2022
As for the second case, it was Canada's head shot in the 71st minute, which bounced off the crossbar of the Moroccan goal to the goal line, in which the referee stopped without issuing any decision, until the "mouse" referee assured him that it was not a goal, and the decision was correct.
Because the ball was the largest part of it inside the goal, but part of it was on the line, and the law stipulates that the ball must completely cross the goal line between the posts and under the crossbar to count as a goal.
🥅 The Moroccan crossbar tackles Canada's most dangerous chances after a header from Hutchinson
Subscribe now 👇
🔗 https://t.co/DjYUE8GiM1
📱 https://t.co/alkogGtHdW #Qatar2022 |
#World_Cup_Qatar_2022 |
#Canada_Morocco #WorldCupQatar2022 |
#Qatar2022 |
#FIFAWorldCup pic.twitter.com/lmrNiAsmOV
- beIN SPORTS (@beINSPORTS) December 1, 2022
The third case - which is the most controversial in the Belgium-Croatia match because it is a complex case - was the cancellation of a penalty kick for Croatia in the 15th minute after returning to the mouse technique and semi-automatic offside, where there is offside on the Croatian player against whom the violation was committed, and the penalty kick was counted in his favor (Karamaric), and it was The referees' decision is correct - also - because the law of the ball stipulates that the wrongdoer does not benefit from his mistake, and the punishment is for the first mistake in such cases.
The referee cancels a penalty kick awarded to Croatia after returning to the VAR .. # World Cup # Qatar 2022 # BEL # HRV # DEVILTIME # Qatar2022 # FIFA WorldCup # Obitelj # Vatreni # CROBEL pic.twitter.com/z6C1j8kn9t
- Al-Kass channels (@alkasschannel) December 1, 2022