Athletes indicated that a victory over Australia was within reach, and they affirmed:
5 reasons behind wasting the opportunity to reach the World Cup 2022, most notably Arruabarina's interventions
Caio scored the only national team goal in Australia.
EPA
A state of sadness dominated the players after the match.
EPA
picture
Athletes and technical analysts identified five technical reasons, which they said were behind the first national football team's loss against Australia the day before yesterday, with two goals against a goal within the Asian play-off and wasting the opportunity to reach the 2022 World Cup, noting that these reasons were represented in the team wasting easy opportunities, Especially in the first half by Hareb Suhail, in addition to the delay of the coach of the national team, Argentinian Arubarina in the substitutions, and some of his interventions were in the interest of the Australian team and relieved psychological pressure on him and enabled him to score the winning goal, in addition to that Orabarina did not take advantage of some of the winning cards that could have been To change the course of the match in the interest of the team, such as pushing the Amuri card early in the match, as well as the absence of adventure and offensive effectiveness, especially for Al-Abyad striker Ali Mabkhout as well as Caio, despite scoring the team’s only goal in the match, and Aruabarina’s lack of adventure and not reading the match correctly and his lack of leadership experience Teams in a match with thisThe importance, and the absence of midfield assistance to the front line, considering that despite the loss, the players of the national team fought on the field and played a strong match that showed that Al-Abyad had many strengths that could be built on in the future.
And they told "Emirates Today": "The Australian team seemed in the match a normal team, and Al-Abyad could have surpassed him and decided the match in his favour since the first half, if Arruabarina knew how to read and take advantage of his winning cards, especially since the team was the best, especially in the first half of the match." .
The former national team coach, Dr. Abdullah Misfer, said that the team could have settled the match in his favour since the first half if he had been able to take advantage of the opportunities that came to him, noting that there are several reasons behind the team losing the match, including not taking advantage of opportunities and the absence of effectiveness and offensive adventure by a coach. The team, although the Australian coach risked putting pressure on the team and succeeded in achieving his goal, stressing that “the coach of the team also did not use the cards he had correctly, such as pushing the Amory card behind the attackers from early in the match, as well as involving Bandar Al-Ahbabi in the party. The right-wing player, and the introduction of an alternative striker for Mabkhout, who was not in his day, or the involvement of Caio as a spearhead, and the midfield did not play its role in helping the front line, in addition to the lack of experience in coaching national teams.”
Misfer stressed that Aruabarina needed to be adventurous and daring in this match, noting that the coach of the national team was betting that the match would be decided by going to extra time and penalty kicks, but his bet was a loser.
He stressed that the players of the national team played a great match and fought hard and presented a beautiful ball, but the team lacked offensive vitality.
In turn, the former Olympic team coach, Ali Ibrahim, confirmed that the Australian team made it clear during the match that it is not that strong team, and that the coach of the national team, Aruabarina, should have used his attacking cards to settle the match, such as pushing Amouri early in the 65th or 70th minute, considering that he was There is more than one option for the team to regain the initiative, especially after Caio’s equalizing goal, which quickly brought the team back into the match, noting that “Arruabarina was not successful in his interventions, especially the withdrawal of Mabkhout and the push of Ali Saleh because that served the Australian team.” Which was pressured, but these interventions relieved the Australians and restored their confidence, which enabled them to score the winning goal, and in return, this put pressure on the team.”
He considered that the interventions made by coach Arruabarina should have been in place so that all the offensive cards were paid from an early date.
Ali Ibrahim indicated that Arrobarina did not read the match correctly, and that the changes he made were a major reason for the team's loss.
For his part, the former international player and legal advisor, Salem Hadid, confirmed that despite the loss, the team presented a strong match and was distinguished by collective performance, but it missed opportunities in the first half, especially by the player Hareb Suhail, who was the star of the match and missed more than three chances. Some players did not provide the required return, such as Walid Abbas, in addition to the attacking players Mabkhout and Kayo, although the latter scored a goal, noting that some of the interventions were late, considering that all these things caused the loss.
Reasons for losing the team
1- Not translating many easy chances into goals, especially those missed by Hareb Suhail in the first half.
2- The absence of adventure and offensive effectiveness, especially by Mabkhout and Kaio.
3- Orabarina's lack of adventure and not reading the match correctly, and some of his interventions were in the interest of Australia.
4- Not to take advantage of the winning cards, such as the payment of the Amuri paper, from an early date.
5- The absence of offensive assistance for the midfield players for the offensive line.
Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news