It consisted in canceling a goal, not taking a penalty, and two sending off cases for "Al-Samawi"

Referees Committee: Hamad Ali's decisions in the Bani Yas and Shabab Al-Ahly match are "correct"

• The technical director of the Referees Committee, Khaled Dokhi, clarifies the arbitration cases in the Shabab Al-Ahly and Bani Yas match.

  From the source

• Director of Rulers Department in the Federation: Ali Al-Tarifi.

picture

The FIFA Arbitration Committee, represented by the Director of the Referees Department in the Federation, Ali Al-Tarifi, and the Committee's Technical Director, former International Referee Khaled Al-Dokhi, confirmed during a briefing session with the media yesterday at the Federation's headquarters in Dubai, the validity of the arbitration decisions made by the arbitration team Led by referee Hamad Ali, during the Shabab Al-Ahly and Baniyas match, finally, in the semi-final round of the President's Cup, which ended with Shabab Al-Ahly winning with a clean goal, and qualifying it for the final match against Al-Nasr.

Arbitration cases, during the match, caused widespread controversy in the sports street, which was the dismissal of Bani Yas player Joao Victor (55), for obtaining the second warning for his use of excessive force, and the red card was announced directly to the player Bani Yas Khamis Al Hammadi (89), in addition to The elimination of a goal by Baniyas, scored by Suhail al-Nubi (34), and a penalty kick was not awarded to Baniyas, due to player Khomeiz being blocked and caught from behind inside the penalty area.

Al-Tarifi said, during the media briefing: “The Referees Committee has hired six international lecturers from three different continents from Europe, Africa and Asia, and the case was sent to each of them individually, and they agreed that there is no penalty kick for Bani Yas, since constipation did not affect the case.” .

He added, "Regarding the canceled target of Bani Yas, the cameras and video technology showed an infiltration case against his player, who was ahead of the last defender of Shabab Al-Ahly by six millimeters, so the referee’s decision was correct in this case."

He continued: "The referee’s decision to expel the player Joao Victor was correct, because he received two warnings, with a case before the second warning, which required his dismissal with the red card."

He continued, "As for the decision to expel the direct player, Khamis Al Hammadi, with the red card, it was correct for his use of extra force with the opponent."

Ali Al-Tarifi and Khaled Al-Dokhi explained during their review of the arbitration cases that accompanied the match and was shown in the video: “Regarding the failure to count a penalty kick for Bani Yas, after his player Khomeiz fell inside the penalty area, the referee’s decision was correct, because the constipation the player was subjected to did not affect In the case ».

Al-Tarifi stressed that “arbitration errors are a major part of football, and no one expects these mistakes to end,” stressing that “the game must be accepted with its mistakes,” noting that “the referee applies what he has learned during the arbitration sessions.”

Al-Tarifi stressed that "everyone was wondering about the time it takes for the video referee to verify the case of infiltration, and it was necessary to verify the validity of the case or not, since verifying the validity of the arbitration case is more important than time."

Al-Tarifi added: "The secret of the expulsion case is the common factor between three players in Bani Yas, as two of them were expelled because they were targeting Shabab Al-Ahly player Kartabiya, to reduce his risk, and the referee's role was to protect the players."

Arbitration cases:

First case:

The canceled goal of Baniyas "infiltrated", because his player was ahead of the last defender of Shabab Al-Ahly by six millimeters.

The second case:

The decision to expel Joao Victor is correct, because he received two warnings with a case before the second warning, which required his dismissal.

Third case:

Khamis Al Hammadi's direct dismissal is correct, for using the extra force with the opponent.

Fourth case:

Not counting a penalty kick for Baniyas was a "correct decision", because the player’s constipation did not affect the case.

Ali Al-Tarifi:

• “3 players from Bani Yas were targeting Cartabia, to reduce its danger, so the role of the referee was to protect him.”

• “The game must accept its mistakes ... the referee applies what he learned during the arbitration sessions.”

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news