“It is best to consult, of course, with people. Imagine the feelings of those relatives whose loved ones died there... Of course, there is no need to make a quick decision,” the parliamentarian explained.
She noted that if the decision to restore is made, then we need to think about whether it is worth changing the direction of this place
“Perhaps we can do something for the children so that life can go on? For the development, for example, of creative talents,” she clarified.
According to her, it is necessary to offer various options, and, after weighing all the pros and cons, make a decision.
“Perhaps, even if we restore it, then fill it with some new content with the memory of those victims and proof that we are in no way afraid, in difficult times, we always unite and that life is in the name of those who, unfortunately , left us, it continues,” the senator concluded.
Earlier, Deputy Speaker of the State Duma Boris Chernyshov said in a conversation with RT that the restoration of Crocus is a matter for the public, not the owner. In his opinion, there is no need to restore it in the form in which it was.