Hong Kong flu, the first modern pandemic

Lunar New Year celebration at Che Kung Temple, Hong Kong, January 26, 2020. REUTERS / Tyrone Siu

Text by: Arnaud Jouve Follow

In the years 1968-1970, the influenza of Hong Kong made a million deaths around the world in an almost general indifference. In 2020, with the Covid-19, it's a whole other matter. The world and our perceptions have changed. A look at what is considered today as the first modern pandemic.

Publicity

Read more

Many pandemics have marked our history dramatically. Some were more virulent than others, all had an element of unknown when they developed, but according to the times, they left different traces. History has been strongly marked by great pandemics: the Antonine plague, between 165 and 180, killed five million; the plague of Justinian, who left Egypt in 541, killed nearly 25 million people around the Mediterranean; the black plague, part of the Black Sea caused, between 1347 and 1352, nearly 200 million deaths, decimating between 30 and 50% of the European population; smallpox killed 56 million people in 1520; cholera, with its six pandemics, killed a million between 1817 and 1923; the dreaded Spanish flu killed between 40 and 50 million between 1918 and 1919, to name only the most important.

Closer to home, our contemporary history confronts us, among other things, with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus - AIDS), revealed in the United States in the 1970s and which has already caused the death of 25 to 36 million people, according to the sources ; tuberculosis, which killed more than 1.8 million people worldwide in 2015 and which is still raging persistently in economically disadvantaged countries. A recent history also marked by the Asian flu, initially identified in the province of Guizhou in China, which will spread around the world, in 1957-1958, killing between one and four million people and which will be at the origin, between 1968 and 1969, another lesser-known pandemic known as Hong Kong fever or influenza.

The plague of 1348 in Florence, engraving after a painting by Luigi Sabatelli (1772-1850) Gettyimages

The history of Hong Kong fever

It is an evolution of the strain of the Asian flu, appeared 10 years earlier, in H3N2 antigen which is at the origin of the flu of Hong Kong. This flu probably appeared in Central Asia or China in February 1968 and very quickly became pandemic. In mid-July 1968, it developed in Singapore and then in the British colony of Hong Kong, where it affected 15% of the population.

At the end of July, Doctor W. Chang warns that "  there are half a million cases in Hong Kong  ", the disease then takes the name of the port city. Hong Kong flu then spread to Southeast Asia, India, Australia, Japan and reached the northern hemisphere during the winter of 1968-1969. American soldiers returning from the Vietnam War will import the disease to America. In three months, there will be 50,000 deaths in the United States. The pandemic spreads in Europe and in autumn 1969, France experienced a first peak with 6,000 deaths in January 1969 alone.

In October 1969, the World Health Organization (WHO)organizes an international conference on the flu of Hong Kong with many scientific experts and believes that the pandemic is over. However during this same period, it continues to spread and between December 1969 and January 1970, a second wave, more virulent, swept over Europe and caused thousands of deaths. France and Germany then displayed an excess mortality rate of more than 40,000 deaths.

Hong Kong flu, which was the third pandemic of the 20th century after the Spanish flu and the Asian flu, will remain underestimated for a long time. It will be necessary to wait for the publication of the research work of the epidemiologist Antoine Flahault in 2003 to know the total number of deaths in France: 31,226 deaths.

According to the WHO global report, between the summer of 1968 and the spring of 1970, the Hong Kong flu killed a million people.

January 1969. Precautions were taken in Russia with the wearing of surgical masks as the influenza epidemic from Hong Kong crossed the Soviet Union. Getty Images / Bettmann / Contributor

An undervalued pandemic

Despite its high mortality, the pandemic arouses little interest in the West. The era was agitated by other concerns, the world was changing, we were in the general optimism of the Thirty Glorious Years but also in a Cold War between West and East. It is the war of Vietnam and its dispute, the models of society are questioned by a part of the youth. In France, as the historian Patrice Bourdelais explains, we are in post-68 management, local strikes are multiplying in many factories, Georges Pompidou replaces de Gaulle, we are indignant at the famine in Biafra , but we are nevertheless in a dynamic of progress which means that we are not very worried.

Politicians have other priorities than Hong Kong fever and scientists do not seem to measure the extent of the pandemic. In July 1968, the Institut Pasteur spoke in the newspaper Le Monde and commented on the epidemic, considering that it did not seem to be of any serious nature. Doctor Geneviève Cateigne of the Institut Pasteur, quoted by Liberation , said in 1969: “  In France there is no real epidemic. In Europe no longer have. There is no need to panic. This epidemic will certainly evolve like a fairly banal seasonal epidemic.  "

In the media, the Hong Kong flu initially goes relatively unnoticed, with the exception of an article quoted by Liberation , from London's Time of July 12, 1968, which warns of a strong wave of respiratory illness in Hong Kong. But in the press as a whole, no one uses the term "pandemic" which had been used for the Asian flu.

Despite the closure of schools due to lack of teachers, certain shops, major disruptions in transport due to a large number of sick staff, and a sharp increase in the number of deaths, the press treats this epidemic with some lightness , considering, as various newspapers quoted by Liberation write that the flu is stationary ... that it seems to be regressing ... that we should not add to the ills the risks of a collective psychosis ...  " At the height of the crisis, France-Soir will give the figure of 12 million patients but the flu from Hong Kong will not make the headlines of the time.

The first pandemic of the modern era

For epidemiologist Antoine Flahault, the Hong Kong flu has gone down in history as the first pandemic of the modern era, perhaps because, as defined by Serge Jaumain, historian at the Université Libre de Bruxelles,  it is characterized by its speed of propagation, due to the very rapid development of means of transport and the multiplication of rapid air transport  ”. But also because it was the first pandemic to have been monitored by an international network and because it is at the origin of numerous modeling works to predict new pandemics.

As of September 1968, the viral strain responsible for the influenza virus was isolated by the Pasteur Institute, but there will be no production of effective influenza vaccine and this production will in any case remain very insufficient to protect the population at a time when getting the flu shot is not very common. Yet a vaccine would have saved many lives and we learned from it. As Patrice Bourdelais points out, "  it was from this point that a systematic policy of encouraging vaccination of the elderly population [against the flu] was put in place  ".

From Hong Kong fever to coronavirus

At the time of the Hong Kong flu, in the years 1968-1970, life expectancy was not the same but above all, it was socially accepted that if a person over the age of 65 died, it was natural whereas today we no longer accept death.

For the historian of the École Pratique des Hautes Etudes de Paris, Vincent Genin, quoted by the RTBF, “  a few years ago, the prospect of dying from an epidemic was frightening but not unacceptable. There has been an evolution of mentalities and today we have reached an anthropological threshold. We no longer accept death. We also observe in our societies, a disappearance of death and its representation. Movements like transhumanism plead for an increased humanity, that is to say, a humanity which crosses death and becomes immortal. "Serge Jaumain adding that"  the cost of human life was probably very different at the time. With the coronavirus crisis, for the first time, societies have chosen life over the economy  . ” Another era…

Newsletter With the Daily Newsletter, find the headlines directly in your mailbox

Subscribe

Follow all international news by downloading the RFI application

google-play-badge_FR

  • WHO
  • UN
  • Coronavirus
  • Hong Kong
  • Health and Medicine
  • our selection

On the same subject

History

The Spanish flu, double punishment of the First World War

Frequency Asia

Before the coronavirus, the ravages of Asian flu and Hong Kong flu

Coronavirus: why the WHO declares the Covid-19 epidemic a pandemic