Democratic Party candidate Elizabeth Warren, who is presenting a program to reduce inequality, has become the target of the US ruling establishment during the presidential election campaign.
The author and economist Julia Cage said in a blog in the French newspaper, Novell Observator, that two years ago, Elizabeth Warren supported Hillary Clinton, saying that she was fighting a "chance to fight" by running for the presidency. But the Democratic candidates have to be patient on a long waiting list, as most candidates for the Democratic Party derive their legitimacy from the time they spend in the political apparatus, and from their ability to raise private funding.
Reducing the policy of inequality
On November 3, 2020, Elizabeth Warren will have the chance to fight an election battle, a battle that will not only be against Republicans, but against conservatives from her democratic fracture as well, like Joe Biden and Michael Bloomberg, who refuse to take advantage of the lessons of the past.
They should also be sure that in order for Democrats to reap the votes of the popular class, the Democratic Party must first place its programs at the center of social, financial, and educational justice.
Democrats should realize that social reforms alone are not enough, especially since the electoral confrontation today with the Republican split is taking place on the economic stage. As for the Republicans, they do not need to attack Elizabeth Warren's aspirational stances to reduce the policy of inequality, or criticize her program, which focuses on enacting a gradual tax on wealth and the public health insurance tax, according to the author.
Economist Larry Summers pushed Democrats to lift financial constraints during the 1990s, knowing that he is the same person who questioned in 2005 the "essential ability" of women to occupy high-level positions in scientific research, and this means that he also questions their ability to Take over the country’s presidency. Larry Summers declared a media war against Warren, or specifically against what he called Warren's radicalism, which he saw as hostile to "progressive".
| Popular classes that have not benefited from economic growth believe that Warren is not radical, especially given their declining purchasing power (European). |
Is Warren really radical, as Larry Summers claims? According to the logic of North American politics, the answer will be "Yes." But it suffices to go back only a few decades to realize that a long time ago the American tax system was making real progress, and that the enactment of a tax on wealth is the only solution that will allow today to limit the policy of inequality, which reached record levels.
To show this, it is enough to take a look at the wealth of one of Warren's most important rivals in the Democratic primary, Michael Bloomberg, who is nearly $ 54.7 billion.
Elizabeth Warren is free from the pressures of the wealthy
She wondered: Is Elizabeth Warren still radical in the eyes of some?
For billionaire owners, they listen well to Joe Biden's speech, which reassured them during fundraising sessions by saying "nothing will change fundamentally if the election is won." This means that the proportion of the rich who have benefited from more than half of economic growth since the end of the economic crisis, will see Warren as "radical".
On the other hand, the popular classes that have not benefited from economic growth are among the groups that believe that Warren is not radical, especially given their declining purchasing power.
And for hundreds of thousands of North American residents, or some donors using the "write-down" fundraising platform, they are participating in an electoral victory for a leftwing lady, even though their donations do not exceed tens of dollars. These young donors are looking for a campaign free from the pressure of wealthy donors.
| Supporters of Elizabeth dream of waking up on November 4, 2020, by the tracks of achieving the presidency of the United States (European). |
A popular reform candidate
After the failure of centrist and elite candidate Hillary Clinton, though she led for the first time in electoral history, she led the Democratic Party to outpace Republicans by garnering more votes than rich voters, she now opens a new page with Warren. This reformist candidate is popular.
"I dream that on November 4, 2020, I wake up to the sound of Warren's achievement, a double win, the first a victory for justice and the fight against inequality, and the second is a victory for women," she concluded.