Coronavirus has been forgotten in “normal” countries. Apparently, not for long, since even among the soldiers of the National Guard of Minnesota, sick patients with COVID-19 have already been found. But while the superiority behind another virus (much more insidious and infectious), the whole so-called developed world (and not just the USA) was in the grip of an epidemic of protests that quickly caused complications in the form of clashes with police, pogroms and arson.

What began as a rally in memory of the black George Floyd, who died at the hands of a policeman in Minneapolis, quickly took on the character of a national protest in the United States. Looting, acts of unprovoked violence and the destruction of urban infrastructure with almost complete impotence of the rule of law - all this has almost become a new reality for America and now Europe.

Already three or four days ago, when the matter was limited only to the United States, it became clear that the tragic death of Floyd has nothing to do with what is happening. The US law enforcement system worked surprisingly quickly and clearly. All four police officers who were detained were immediately dismissed. The investigation was carried out by local and federal authorities. Soon the immediate culprit of the tragedy was arrested. He was charged with murder. Three other policemen who were present at the crime scene also started business. In addition, the US Department of Justice is continuing to test to identify signs of racial hatred in the actions of the accused and the entire Minneapolis police department. Perhaps former law enforcers will receive considerable (if not life) terms.

Almost all the heads of the US police departments quickly responded to the tragedy. They condemned the actions of the arrested policeman and promised to conduct additional trainings with their subordinates on the implementation of detentions, as well as on interacting with local communities. Even Donald Trump, whom liberals often call the nation’s main racist, has expressed regret and concern for what has happened. It was on his orders that the Ministry of Justice launched a federal investigation, which I mentioned above.

Such an unambiguous and quick decision not in favor of the delinquent policeman has never been taken before. In the past, even with the more dubious reaction of the authorities to cases of police violence, protests and, as often happens, the riots and looting accompanying them were not so massive. And in this case, everything had to end and very quickly. A few rallies, a mumble of liberal television channels about “systemic racism” and the need for police reform, Biden’s statement that this would not happen with him, and that’s all.

But no! Like burning liquid spreading from a Molotov cocktail bottle, protests and pogroms spread throughout the United States. Liberal governors and mayors of cities, as well as mainstream media, took the side of the rebels.

They still continue to talk about “peaceful protests,” but even the picture they show does not match those words. However, some “talking heads” no longer conceal that the violent actions of the raging crowds are quite consistent with the spirit of the moment.

CNN is especially zealous in instilling militant tolerance. On the day when Trump announced that he was ready to use the fullness of his power (including using army units, if necessary) to suppress riots, the hosts shouted from the screen: “America, wake up!” They insisted on the onset of military dictatorship and demanded to take the "right side of history." The dark-skinned announcer Don Lemon triumphed: “What, scary? This is the kind of fear that white Americans experience today, blacks experienced in the 1960s before the Lynch trial! ” And numerous invited experts, day after day, argued that without riots and robberies, the voice of African Americans would hardly have been heard.

The rebels have a whole army of support in the face of current and retired politicians. Despising the prevailing unspoken rule for former presidents, Barack Obama was actively involved in propaganda and organizational work. At first he published an article in which he gave some important, in his opinion, advice to the protesters. The main thing, as he believes, is "not to stop." The ex-president also called for a clearer formulation of requirements for local authorities and the mandatory participation in elections. But, apparently, only the first recommendation was accepted.

Joe Biden also made his vision of the situation. Reading a text on the teleprompter, he said little substantive. But the main thing is not what he said, but what was not mentioned in his speech: he did not condemn violence and robbery. Only once did Biden mention the preference for peaceful protest. The rest of his speech was devoted to the upcoming elections and "systemic racism" in the United States. The very racism that Biden had not managed to cope with during his long Washington career.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists have begun collecting electronic signatures for the “Deprive Police Financing” petition. This initiative was immediately supported by a wide variety of left-liberal groups and digital platforms. Who will maintain the rule of law is not specified in the petition. Although the answer to this question is clear and so - in the cities should be established the power of left-wing radical activists who are not shy about using force.

Media friends of rebels about the education of the younger generation. Vogue Teen (the teenage version of the popular glossy magazine Vogue) published an article with a story about what the so-called antifa are fighting for, which Trump is going to recognize as a home terrorist organization. For a response, the publication turned to the ultra-leftist professor at Dartmouth College, Mark Bray, the author of the highly dubious monograph Antifa: A Guide to Antifascistism, in which the activity of left-wing radicals is mainly praised, but in its obviously unsightly manifestations it is justified.

It was explained to young Americans who read gloss that militant youths from the most diverse combat cells under the common “umbrella” of the antifa are fighters with manifestations of fascism and white suprematism, and violent methods of fighting them are sometimes only possible due to the “inaction and indifference” of the police, courts and authorities of all levels. Neither give nor take - revolutionary expediency!

If the matter concerned only the United States, it could be assumed that the only goal of well-coordinated riots is President Trump, who is hated by left-wing politicians, the media and their sponsors.

In national journalism today, the terms “American spring” and “American maidan” are often used with caustic irony (or even in all seriousness). Like, the methods that the United States used in Ukraine, the Middle East, Latin America and tried to apply in Russia, today hit them with a boomerang. Fully understanding the desire of my colleagues to triumphantly point out the embodiment of the Russian proverb about another hole dug, I cannot help but point out that the important question remains unanswered: who applied this method in America? The mechanism of action of the boomerang is not presented.

Everything more or less falls into place if you recall that the technology of “color revolutions” abroad of the United States was used from the supply of think tanks responsible for the ideological and strategic support of neoconservatives and liberal interventionists who seized control of Washington’s foreign policy in the 1990s. Although these two “scientific” trends were in the service of different parties, by the mid-2010s they practically ceased to differ from each other in terms of the set of recommendations addressed to Western politicians.

In 2015, when Donald Trump was already smoldering and started his election campaign, ex-president George W. Bush, junior and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, along with the old elites of Republicans and Democrats, were indistinguishable in style, political agenda and attitude to “internal to the enemies of the West ”in the person of American and European“ isolationists ”.

The globalist elite, of course, was dissatisfied with the independence of Russia and the individual demarches of China, but most of all it was concerned about the preservation of its power, provided by the power of transnational corporations, the world financial oligarchy and cosmopolitan expertocracy. This elite was the very global leadership that Trump, the ideologists of Brexit, Eurosceptics and national populist politicians around the world, challenged.

Yes, the main headquarters of the global bosses are mainly in Washington and New York, but this does not mean that it relates to the United States (as a nation-state) and their citizens in a different way than to residents of other countries, including those designated in the world liberal press as "wrong." So the point is not the presence of an American embassy in any country, but the determination of the global authorities to apply the technology of “righteous” anti-constitutional rebellion not just anywhere, but in the USA and other “indigenous” Western countries.

The danger of re-electing Donald Trump for a second term and the associated risks of a second wave of victories for national-populist movements in Europe were recognized as serious enough to use the "prodigy" of liberal globalism, not in the periphery, but in the heart of a "right world" . And here is the “Maidan,” blazing in cities and villages of the United States.

This explanation would be incomplete and even doubtful (if only from the point of view of tactics) if the preventive “color” strikes were not also inflicted in other states of the Euro-Atlantic.

But now everything fell into place. Protests in which BLM slogans are used as “flashing guns” swept through many European countries and the Anglo-Saxon states of the British Commonwealth of Nations. Particularly noteworthy are the "carpet bombing" of Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand - the very countries that, according to Trump, were to enter the post-global American macro-region.

In the United Kingdom, demonstrations quickly (the speed is astounding) moved into skirmishes with the police and law enforcement officers had already forced one to one knee - a universal gesture of submission to the “new order”. The left-liberal media did not take long: as in the USA, they sided with "righteously angry." The British The Guardian writes that "England is not at all innocent," and in Australia, the media unearthed a long-forgotten story about the oppression of indigenous Aborigines.

In the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, France, Greece, etc. - slogans approved by the global party committee developed for the American BLM are everywhere heard, Molotov cocktails are prepared and cobblestones hitched in advance, special agitators urge law enforcement officers to stand on one knee (and not without success) , the press insists on the “white man’s guilt” and the justification of “sometimes unrestrained” forms of protest.

The Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, previously considered to be a “solid globalist”, also felt the loyalty to the ideals of globalization. The whole world today is discussing an almost minute pause, which the head of the Canadian government took at a press conference to answer the question of the journalist about the assessment of events in the United States. Trudeau finally formulated his answer, very cautious and half-hearted, but this caution will not save him in the coming days and weeks - the global authorities and his left-wing radical guard do not need “conciliators”. Each leader of the “right” country will be required to “take sides.” Oaths are temporarily pardoned, the rest will be tried to destroy - morally, politically, and someone financially (not yet, not physically, but financially, as was done with the first Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn).

The global “bombardment” of the so-called developed world by racial issue charges and media special operations (sometimes, as in the case of Canada, preventive) against state leaders should be appreciated. This is a well-planned and well-implemented global offensive campaign. As many liberal experts in the West have said and are saying, 2020 will be the decisive year "for the future of liberal democracy."

Well, perhaps it is. Invertingly paraphrasing the words of the classic of Marxism-Leninism, I will say that our task in this situation is to prevent the global authorities from turning the civil war in the West into an imperialist war against Russia.

In this sense, the thesis about Russia as an “island of tranquility” appears in a completely different light. We must do everything in our power to prevent “interested parties” from successfully using the “miracle weapon” that breaks the fabric of the once united West for us and our closest geopolitical environment.

The first thing that we have to do is to realize the need to create a high-tech and deeply echeloned defense against the global “wunderwaffe”. This is a big and difficult task, which must be solved now.

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.