The experienced metressa of Ukrainian politics Yu.V. Tymoshenko, commonly referred to as the “little girl”, quarreled with many Presidents of Independence. V.F. Yanukovych even put her in jail. Liberated by the revolutionary guides, Tymoshenko did not abandon her fervent habits and began to intrigue against P.A. Poroshenko, and when Poroshenko came down, she predictably switched to V.A. Zelensky.

It all started pretty sweetly. As explained by V.A. Zelensky, “Yulia Vladimirovna brought a list of her people for appointment to the“ sweet ”places. In return, she promised to vote for all laws during the year along with the “Servant of the People” in the Verkhovna Rada. Of course, we refused. After all, the era of negotiation ended forever. " At the same time, the comic artist released the reprise, praising the beautiful view of Yu.V. Tymoshenko: “Such a figure! Do you know why? Because now they just don’t give me sweets. ”

It seems that the Ukrainian politicum is intensively studying the book of E.V. Tarle “Talleyrand”, instructively telling about a great state husband who managed to sell and resell everyone, and he did it repeatedly. The experience is undoubtedly useful for Ukrainian politicians.

The married bishop in the service of the Directory used the term “sweetness” (les douceurs) in negotiations with representatives of the United States. The overseas colonists were rather slow-witted, and I had to explain to them in plain text that if they want to satisfy their needs as soon as possible, they should be given a little "sweetie." The Americans did not understand the intricacies of European politics and created a scandal.

V.A. Zelensky proved himself exactly the founding father, not just refusing Yu.V. Tymoshenko - “Well, they don’t agree on the price, it happens,” but he condemned the sweet seeker in an American way. Just like in 1798: “And this bishop, who denied his God, did not hesitate to extort 50 thousand pounds from us. Art. for sweetie, 50 thousand pounds Art. to the satisfaction of their vices! ”

Yulia Vladimirovna, having heard this, did not hesitate in the reciprocal wound - “you were a dirty broom, you become it again!”. Namely, V.A. pointed out Zelensky has his soon future: “Some Ukrainian presidents think that they have taken the jackpot! And then everything according to the scenario ... We are waiting for you at corporate parties ... You can with your piano. "

Probably, for the sake of the last word, the whole passage was uttered: it was understood that when he was at the time he was a comic artist V.A. Zelensky brought people laughter and joy, portraying the game as a shameful oud on the piano.

Adherents Yu.V. Tymoshenko rejoiced: “Bravo, Yulechko! In gratrotі words, in wisdom you do not need to in Ukraine! Dyakuyu for you simply gorgeous vіdpovіd membership! ”

In short, the gap turned out decisive and colorful.

But, distracting from the piano preludes and returning to the essence of the matter, we can assume that the servant of the people V.A. Zelensky considered the offer of Yu.V. Tymoshenko is irrelevant.

The formal capital of Yulia Vladimirovna is 25 mandates of the “Fatherland”. 5.5%. Whereas Zelensky can count on 250 mandates of his party, plus 23 mandates “For the Future” and another 20 mandates of the Shepilovs who joined them. Only 293 mandates out of 450, i.e. 65%. Why, with such a solid base, also give Yu.V. Tymoshenko on the "sweetie"?

If the base was unshakable, like a rock, there would probably be no need to give. But parliamentary support is generally not 100% reliable, and in the tradition of the Ukrainian politicum and father’s father to sell at a reasonable price, such support is purely and unreliably.

In part, this was already reflected in the voting on agrarian reform: only 240 deputies voted for it (by no means 293), and “for” there were only 227 “servants of the people,” not 250. In addition, it should be borne in mind that this Rada’s composition works less six months, signs of erosion of the presidential majority are evident.

So, perhaps, Julia Vladimirovna, who wanted a “sweetie,” knew what she was talking about. Again, many years of experience.

Moreover, in her proposal itself there was nothing particularly scandalous. All coalitions are formed on the principle "you - me, I - to you." You give me voices, and I give you more or less tasty (one might say “sweet”) posts. The whole parliamentary democracy is based on such an agreement. If someone (V.A. Zelensky, for example) does not like this, then all claims are not against Yulia Vladimirovna, but towards bright parliamentarism.

And if the deal did not take place, after which the piano arguments come into play, then this is a feature of independent parliamentarism. Premiere A.P. Yatsenyuk, speaking from the parliamentary tribune, was even grabbed by the buttocks, but here they just called him a member of the gym. Nice joke, nothing more.

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.