Of all the ideological manipulations perpetrated by the media in this month of August, the most brazen is the one that tried to convince us that the Frenchman Macron wanted to save the Amazon from the Bolsonaro bird, who wanted to burn him. Neither the Amazon is burning 90% more than other years, neither Brazil protects the Amazon, armored by 80%, nor Macron has sought anything other than sabotage the EU-Mercosur agreement that would allow Brazilian agriculture -25% of GDP- compete with the French and improve their yield without having to make arable more unprofitable hectares. That is, that the numbers of the fires are false, Macron's intention is the opposite of the one published and what Macroneón , turned into Macronaro , is looking for is to improve his surveys in agricultural France, addicted to EU protectionism from the CAP , Franco-German invention to pamper your rural vote against Spanish or Italian exports, something that Marine Le Pen would lead almost to border closures. And since the FN has already won the European ones to Macron , he has become lepenistic but camouflaging the protectionism of feminism, which is valid for everything: a broken one, a riot and a scoundrel.

Dan Nepstad, the largest expert in the Amazon and a member of the UN Climate Change Panel, that is, an orthodox, has said that everything published this summer about fires is "pure garbage", that fires have increased only a 7%, especially of scrubland and low forest, less in Brazil than in Bolivia (where they started, but, as Evo Morales is a communist-indigenist, nobody reproaches him for anything) and that the problem of radical and anti-scientific environmentalism, from which they take advantage Demagogues refitoleros to the Macron, is that it is losing the support of farmers, necessary to maintain a reasonable balance between the exploitation of the land and its conservation. Nepstad adds that the unjust accusations against the clumsy Bolsonaro will only lead Brazil to a greater closure , when the EU-Mercosur agreement, almost closed before the liberator Macron, is good for negotiating what interests the farmer, which is to keep the land and improve their income, and what interests the consumer, which are low prices and quality products.

And Brigitte says nothing, this Nepstad? Nothing. Neither of Epstein. Neither of Polanski. It is seen that he does not read the press.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Brazil
  • Mercosur
  • GDP
  • Marine Le Pen
  • France
  • Columnists

G7 Summit Donald Trump's third G7: from bad to worse

On the other handMachismo and denialismo

Tribune University: myth and reality