Was the “Siberian unicorn” really a unicorn?

• The “Siberian unicorn” would be a rhinocerotid whose fossilized horn has not even been found, according to our partner The Conversation.

• The reconstruction of the horns of ancient rhinos is indeed very speculative since these appendages mostly escape fossilization.

• This analysis was conducted by Christophe Mallet, doctor in functional morphology – paleontology at the National Museum of Natural History.

Do you know

 ?

4.5 meters long and 2 meters at the withers for a mass of 4 to 5 tons, this cousin of modern rhinos is one of the largest rhinocerotids known to date.

In addition to its extraordinary dimensions,

is mainly known for the unique appearance of its skull.

One meter long, it is immediately striking by the presence of a gigantic bony dome above the orbits, covered with roughness and traces of powerful blood vessels.

A unique aspect among rhinocerotids, which led paleontologists, from the end of the 19th century, to propose reconstructions of the animal wearing a gigantic horn in the middle of its forehead.

Thus was born the image of the "unicorn of Siberia", even though no fossilized horn of

has ever been found to date... So, did "unicorns" really exist?

Drawing of the old view of Elasmotherium caucasium with a single horn questioned today © Dmitry Bogdanov / Wikimedia, CC BY (via The Conversation)

Horn, a material that fossilizes poorly

Providing a reliable reconstruction of extinct living beings is one of the main objectives of paleontology, but also one of its most delicate missions.

Indeed, the vast majority of fossilized remains available to paleontologists concern the hard and naturally mineralized parts of the organism (shell, skeleton, teeth), the preservation of soft or perishable parts being only possible under conditions of fossilization. very special and fundamentally rare.

Thus, like the skin, hair or scales, the horns of mammals, made up of keratin (like our nails and our hair), most of the time escape fossilization.

If the horn of bovids develops on a bony base (called an ankle or horn) which generally fossilizes very well and therefore allows a good approximation of its shape, that of rhinos has a unique structure.

Formed of keratin fibers clumped together, rhinoceros horns develop on simple rough areas on the frontal and nasal bones: in the absence of bony ankles, it is therefore very difficult to say precisely the size and shape of the rhinoceros. a rhinoceros horn with only the skull!

Thus, except for a few specific cases such as the woolly rhinoceros,

White rhino (left) and woolly rhino (right) skulls topped with their horns © Wikimedia, CC BY (via The Conversation)

Let's go back to

, one of the most emblematic animals of the Eurasian Pleistocene megafauna (geological period extending from 2.58 million years to 11,700 years before the present).

Appeared a little over 2 million years ago in Eurasia, this animal was thought to have disappeared around 200,000 years ago, until a 2018 study reshuffled the cards: the reanalysis of several bone remains of

has made it possible to reassess the disappearance of the genus around 39-36,000 years before our era.

Our Eurasian

ancestors could therefore have encountered it!

The dehorned unicorn

A Russian-Ukrainian team, led by Vadim Titov, from the Federal University of Rostov-on-the-Don (Russia), set out, at the end of 2021, to closely re-study the cranial anatomy of

to propose a updated reconstruction of the animal's head.

For Titov and his team, the verdict is clear: the bone dome, with very thin walls, was relatively fragile and probably could not support the weight of a 2-meter horn.

The dome must have been covered by a fairly low keratinized area, perhaps pointing slightly backwards.

But in any case, the authors of the study exclude the presence of a gigantic horn as usually represented!

They also consider the presence of a small keratinized area in the nasal position, which would give

not one but two "pseudohorns" on the skull.

Reconstruction of the head of Elasmotherium proposed by Vadim Titov's team © Titov et al.

2021, Russian Journal of Theriology (via The Conversation)

A new reconstruction which contrasts completely with the image of Epinal that this animal has conveyed for decades, and which could make it lose its nickname of "unicorn"!

Especially since Vadim Titov's team is not the first to propose such a reconstruction for

, since other Russian scientists had already assumed a keratinized dome surmounted by a very small horn from the years 1950-60.

A reconstruction that quickly fell into oblivion in favor of a representation certainly much more impressive, but not based on any real evidence.

One of the first representations of Elasmotherium with a very small horn, proposed by VA Teryaev and VA Vatagin in 1934 © V. Zhegallo et al., 2005 (via The Conversation)

If it was not the support of a gigantic horn, what could this dome be used for?

The research team sees two main functions in the presence of this strange frontal appendage.

By significantly increasing the surface of the nasal mucous membranes, this dome was to endow

a very powerful sense of smell, undoubtedly useful for detecting its food, consisting in particular, according to Titov and his team, of buried plant bulbs, as well as grasses growing in the steppes.

But this dome was also intended to produce and amplify the sounds emitted by the animal, perhaps for communication purposes during clashes between males or simply daily within groups.

However, the authors exclude a direct use in combat as in modern rhinos or mouflons: the very thin bone wall of the dome would probably not have resisted impacts carried out by animals weighing 5 tons!

​Parietal representations to be reassessed

This new "dented" reconstruction of

could appear disappointing for all those attached to the classic representation of this giant rhinoceros.

But in the absence of fossilized horns, it remains arguably the most believable to date.

Reconstruction of an Elasmotherium sibiricum skeleton © Ivan Iofrida / Wikimedia CC BY-SA 4.0

Nevertheless, associated with the recent reassessment of the disappearance of this animal, the work of Titov and his team makes it possible to better understand the paleoecology of

, and in particular the possible interactions between human groups and this giant rhinoceros.

Indeed, if the recent reassessment of the disappearance of

at about 36,000 years ago suggests that

could have crossed these animals, now this new reconstruction allows us to appreciate with a new eye the possible parietal representations of this atypical rhinoceros. .

Eyes turn in particular to the Russian cave of Kapova, south of the Urals, where strange representations of rhinoceros were sometimes interpreted as those of an

, without certainty: despite the low head and the powerful withers, the horn seemed strangely too short…until today!

In the light of this change in the representation of the animal, a multitude of prehistoric works could find themselves reinterpreted in the near future.

Two possible silhouettes of Elasmotherium represented in red ocher in the Russian cave of Kapova, in the Upper Palaeolithic © V. Zhegallo et al., 2005 (via The Conversation)

In addition, this new reconstruction of

also reminds us that, although the horn is the most symbolic element of the rhinoceros, most of the fossil genera known to date did not have it, or only very small ones!

The horn has in fact only appeared in a few lineages over time, and the fact that the 5 current species all bear it should not make us forget that this cranial appendage is more an exception than a rule on the scale of the evolutionary history of rhinos.

Our file “PALEONTOLOGY”

No matter: even without a gigantic horn, the so-called "Siberian unicorn" remains a fascinating animal whose mysteries are far from having been elucidated.

Science

Paleontology: Were these dinosaurs bipedal, quadrupedal… or both?

Science

Paleontology: Huge reptiles roamed Provence (long) before the appearance of dinosaurs

This analysis was written by Christophe Mallet, doctor in functional morphology – paleontology at the National Museum of Natural History (MNHN).

The original article was published on The Conversation website.

Access to this content has been blocked to respect your choice of consent

By clicking on "

", you accept the deposit of cookies by external services and will thus have access to third-party content

I ACCEPT

You can also modify your choices at any time via "choice of consent".

More information on the Cookie Management Policy page.

• Paleontology

• Siberia

• podcast

• Science

• The Conversation

• Rhinoceros

• Evolution

• 0 comment

• 0 share

  • Share on Messenger

  • Share on Facebook

  • Share on Twitter

  • Share on Flipboard

  • Share on Pinterest

  • Share on Linkedin

  • Send by Mail

• To safeguard

• A fault ?

• To print