[Pick] 'Room n' 'Commute sentence' in 30s who purchased sexual exploits and committed sexual abuse Why?

A man in his 30s who purchased sexual exploitation of children and adolescents in the Telegram 'Nth Room' and committed sexual crimes was commuted in the second trial.

The Seoul High Court Chuncheon Tribunal's Criminal Division 1 (Chief Judge Park Jae-woo) broke the original sentence of 7 years in prison for 39-year-old A, who was charged with violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth (production and distribution of pornography), and sentenced to 5 years in prison. It was announced on the 7th that he was sentenced to one year.

From 2014 to 2015, Mr. A went to a massage parlor and filmed other people's body parts that could cause sexual shame multiple times without consent, and from 2017 to 2020, he paid a price to children and adolescents and had sex several times. He was brought to trial on charges of committing a sexual offense.

It is known that Mr. A even sexually abused the child by hitting important parts of the child's body with his hands.

▲ The above picture is not directly related to the content of the article.

In addition, Mr. A was also charged with purchasing sexual exploitation materials from 'Kelly', the second operator of 'Room n', and possessing 3,500 pieces of child and adolescent sexual exploitation.

'Kelly' is a person who is known to have inherited 'Room n' from Hyung-wook Moon, 'God God', who was the first creator of 'Room n'.

Last year, the police drew attention by deciding to disclose Mr. A's personal information for the first time as a buyer of sexual exploitation in 'Room n', but it was eventually canceled as the court cited Mr. A's 'application for an injunction to suspend the disclosure of personal information'.

The second trial judge pointed out that "the crime of the accused is of a bad quality, such as negatively affecting the character development of the victims who are in the period of forming sexual values."

However, he said, "This court has admitted all the crimes, and there is no history of punishment. The sentence in the first trial is rather heavy in light of the fact that the defendant was only punished when he submitted the external hard drive to the investigation agency, and that some of the victims agreed." stated the reason.

This is a 'news pick'.