I am a poor victim in trouble.

We are looking for good righteous and courageous human rights lawyers and neighbors with good ties to help us as litigation agents.

Even if you are not the representative of the lawsuit, any useful information regarding the lawsuit would be greatly appreciated.

I will repay my grace by remembering and living.



It was on March 13th that I received an e-mail with this in the subject

"I'm looking for a courageous litigation agent to help my neighbor in need

." At the time, I was very busy working on the final revision of the book, The Bad Judgment, to be published in April. As I was in a situation where I had to focus on the current case rather than taking on a new case, I was carrying the phrase "If you do one, don't forget that you can't do the other!"



But I couldn't help it. I should have glanced at my palm when I thought,'If I was frustrated, would I have sent this e-mail to an attorney who doesn't have one-sided knowledge?' It's been a long time since my finger clicked the reply button. Looking at the litigation data sent, I foresaw that another'bad judgment' would be produced, and I thought I had to stop it. I jumped in again.



This incident took place for 48 hours from December 30, 2018 to January 1, 2019. At 12:30 p.m. on December 30, the victim was blinded by a foreigner's eyes. It was'severe injury' in legal terms. The victims' families barely found the perpetrator, but it turned out that they were not even registered as foreigners. What if I escaped to a foreign country, I asked the police to prepare for such a situation.



Under the criminal law, a serious injury crime is a serious crime that is equivalent to a long term imprisonment of three years or more. Since the perpetrator is a foreigner, there is also a high risk of running away. Therefore, it was possible to make an emergency arrest under the Criminal Procedure Act. Nevertheless, the police gently released the suspect, who was not even banned from leaving the country, without urgent arrest, and the suspect left the country without any restraint on January 1, 2020. As a result of the police's easy response, the victim lost the opportunity to receive compensation for damage, including medical expenses, from the perpetrator.



The victims and their families, who did not receive a penny from the perpetrators, had to initiate a national lawsuit against the illegal duties of the police who responded to them. However, the lawsuit, which began on May 14, 2019, did not proceed properly. In the physical appraisal procedure to prove the damage suffered by the victim, both ophthalmologists and plastic surgery specialists in general hospitals selected by the court tested the appraisal. It was the reason I was busy. The appraisal procedure was changed three times, and in February this year, even the judge changed due to the transfer of the judge's personnel.



I thought it was unavoidable that the trial was delayed and the judge changed. However, in the trial on March 11, the words of the judge, which were newly changed, were like cheers. Aren't you saying you're going to be sentenced a month after the trial ends today? The parties shouted that it was unfair to end the trial without feeling like this, but the judge concluded the trial by leaving a word to appoint a new attorney and submit an application to reopen the defense. The e-mail I received reached me through this story.



While the court has adopted and is undergoing a physical appraisal procedure, this sentence is infringed upon the parties' right to a trial. As there were comments left by the judge, I asked the court in writing to reopen the pleadings. However, the judge sentenced the judgment on April 22 as scheduled.



The reasons stated in the judgment were only two lines.




And I ran into this phrase without fail.



"In the Small Claims Judgment, the reason may not be stated pursuant to Article 11-2, Paragraph 3 of the Small Claims Trial Act."



The parties were very disintegrated. He even said he was angry when he saw the pleadings. On the date of the last pleading, when the new judge said that he would end the trial right away, neither the scream that screamed, ``It shouldn't be that way,'' and the judge's words to appoint a new lawyer to open the pleading again were not properly recorded in the lawsuit record. . In fact, in the pleading record, which recorded the date of pleading held on March 11, 2021, no dialogue was left behind that day. Instead, only four letters were recorded in the dossier, like a death sentence that trampled on someone's hope.



'Byeon. Ron. End. End.'



April 25th was the day of the law. This is to commemorate April 25, the enforcement date of the Court Constitution Act, which first introduced the modern judicial system in 1895. But the sentence, sentenced three days before the day of the law, raises these questions.



"Does our judicial system really exist for citizens?"



And I thought this as I looked at the pleading record, which did not contain a scream that the trial should not be finished, but only left four letters of'termination of pleading'.



"Wouldn't it be time to sentence death to such a judicial system that ignores the cries of citizens?"





Depending on the amount of the claim, the court puts a'small case' label and omits the reason for the judgment. It's not just a story in a novel or a drama. It is a'real story' that is taking place in the Korean courts in 2021.



"A good law is not given by itself, it is what we win," said German jurist Hermann Cantorowitz. What must we do to win the courts where the citizens are the owners?



The'Small Claims Trial Act', which allowed the court to leave the grounds for judgment with a label of'small claims' that the amount of the claim does not exceed 30 million won, and the words spoken in the court are obligated to be recorded so that words that the judge wants to remain in the pleadings are not shortened. Shouldn't we start with the sentence of death under the'Civil Procedure Act' left behind?



#In-it #In-it #Choi Jung-gyu #Struggle for common sense # Meet'In



-It', which you will think about with this article, now.


[In-It] "I lost the lawsuit, but there is no reason in the judgment."