Jeon tax, 3,59 billion won
3.59 billion won is the Guri city budget.
The city of Guri gave the money to a building owner.
Of course there is a reason.
It is in the name of the charter fee.
This is the money paid by the city of Guri on the condition of using the building as a temporary building for the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center for three years.
Guri City, of course, can get 3.59 billion won back later.
As of today (23rd), it is just a year later.
The contract period is from April 23, 2019 to April 22, 2021.
Then, you can enter the newly built building in the existing Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center.
Extended guarantee insurance policy
Guarantee insurance policy is a kind of safety device.
When a large amount of jeonse is incurred, you are enrolled in a cheonsei guarantee insurance.
This is to be prepared for situations in which the landlord cannot return the rent for the first time.
The cost of signing up for guarantee insurance is paid by the landlord.
When I rented the temporary office building of the Administrative Welfare Center in Inchang-dong, I subscribed to this type of jeonse guarantee insurance.
When signing up for the first time, the contract period was two years.
And recently, it is known that it has been extended for an additional year until the final expiration date, April 22, 2021.
What if the construction of the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center is completed by April 2021?
Prior to this, the city council came up with a plan for the completion of the new office building before the expiration of medicines around the world.
If it is done as it is, there is no problem.
What will happen if you can't build it by this time?
Everything is entangled.
First of all, it is because of the issue of the temporary office building contract for the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center.
Earlier, the building owner made a phone call with SBS reporters and insisted that they suffered a loss from this contract (3.59 billion won in jeon tax).
You could get a higher price, but in a big way, you signed a cheaper contract.
It is unlikely that the contract will be extended unless there is a change in the mindset of the building owner.
It is expected that the jeon tax will be returned to Guri-si with 3.59 billion won.
The landlord can do it by signing a monthly rent contract with another tenant or by making a global drug for a higher amount.
Nakdong River Duck Egg?
Concerns come true
This is a report on the construction of the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center, prepared by Guri City in March.
It has been changed from the original plan.
The planned start date is September 2021, and the completion date is November 2022.
It has been extended for more than six months.
Are there any alternatives to the use of temporary buildings?
Current temporary building owners are extremely unlikely to extend their contracts that they are losing money.
If so, the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center should look for another temporary office building.
You need to find an office for short-term use before November 2022.
Moving costs and remodeling costs are incurred again.
This cost will also be used for Guri citizens' blood tax.
SBS previously raised the question of the fact that the Inchang-dong Administrative Welfare Center signed a global drug prior to the building safety assessment and Gyeonggi-do local financial investment review.
The city of Guri has stated that there are no problems with the transfer process.
I speak to the old woman.
I am not asking if it is a procedural violation.
As can be seen from internal documents, Guri City has concluded that it cannot be completed within the world medicine period (3 years) by itself.
It seems inevitable that the criticism that Guri City has hurried to the provisional government building global drug.
'Real' Inchang-dong residents' opinions must be heard
First of all, the city of Guri needs to listen to the opinions of the'real' residents of Inchang-dong.
If a survey is needed on the temporary administration of the Administrative Welfare Center, the opinions of the'real' residents of Inchang-dong should be reflected.
If a survey was conducted on 1,000 people, all 1,000 respondents would have to be residents of Inchang-dong, right?