A man in his thirties who put his urine in coffee that another female customer drank in a PC room was sentenced to prison for damage to property.



Today (29th), Ulsan District Court 2 alone (Judge Yoo Jung-woo) said that 33-year-old A, who was charged with property damage, theft, and unlicensed driving in violation of the Road Traffic Law, was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 won for eight months in prison.



On June 7, 2020, while using a PC room in Jung-gu, Ulsan, A, while a female customer sitting nearby was away, put her urine in the iced coffee a woman drank.

It was investigated that Mr. A had been urinating in a drinking water bottle in advance and was aiming for a crime opportunity.




On June 23 of the same year, Mr. A urinates in the iced coffee of another female customer in the same way.

The police

applied the

charges

for

property damage,

claiming that Mr. A damaged someone else's property in a way that harmed the utility of drinks worth 3,500 won and 1,500 won, respectively

.



In addition, Mr. A was

accused of stealing

an

electric scooter

worth 600,000 won with the key inserted

,

and stealing 210,000 won of cash

from his bag while an acquaintance who was drinking with was away

.

It was also revealed that the stolen electric scooter was driven without a license, and the

charges

of

violating

the

Road Traffic Act were

even applied.



Victims of the theft crime agreed with Mr. A and expressed their intention to disapprove the punishment, but it is known that the PC cafe guests, who are victims of property damage, did not forgive Mr. A and thus could not reach an agreement.




The judge noted the fact that Mr. A was sentenced to probation only a month ago for theft and driving without a license, and pointed out that he committed the same kind of crime again during the probation period.



In particular, regarding the crime of pissing coffee into coffee by female customers, he said, "When you synthesize the crime scene, motive, and content, including the fact that the crime was committed in a grotesque manner for no reason, the guilt is bad and the risk of recidivism is quite high.



The judge said, "There is a need for severe punishment on Mr. A, so sentence sentences are inevitable. However, Mr. A is deeply reflecting on his wrongdoing while acknowledging all his crimes, and Mr. A is a person with a mental retardation level 3 disability. "I do," he revealed the reason for the sentence.



This is'News Pick'.