<Anchor>
In a lawsuit for the division of the property of Goo Hara, a singer who died last year, a court ruling came that the father who raised Koo should receive 20% more of his property than the mother who left the children.
Raising children is a natural duty of parents, but the contribution of a father raised alone must be specially recognized.
<Reporter> After
singer Goo Hara passed away in November of last year, Goo's mother came to an empty place.
It is known that Koo and his brother grew up from the father's hand, and their mother had never been contacted after Koo left the house when he was 9 years old.
However, her mother, who appeared after 20 years, asked for half of the price for the sale of Koo's real estate.
[Koo In-ho/Goo Hara's brother (Last May 22nd at the National Assembly press conference): I was very shocked that the mother who had abandoned me and Goo Hara made such an unreasonable request.]
According to the current civil law, Gu has a spouse or child. Because there is no, 50% of each birth parent inherits the property.
Goo's brother filed a lawsuit claiming that it was unfair for a mother who had abandoned her parenting obligation to receive half of her property.
And the court decided that the inheritance ratio should be 6 to 4, and Koo's father should receive 20% more.
He said that the duty of parenting includes not only paying for the costs, but also the efforts of parents to support their children's physical and mental development.
[Roh Jong-eon/Attorney (Goo Hara's side): Recognizing a special contribution to parents who raised their children alone can be seen as a more advanced judgment from the standpoint of the court.]
Goo said that if the victory was confirmed, the children in difficult situations were treated He said he would create a helping foundation.
(Video editing: Kim Jun-hee)