The decision of the court is drawing attention as the deadline for interrogation of the request for suspension of execution, which Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol disapproved of the two-month suspension of execution, is set on the 22nd.
It is expected that the court, which will hear the case of suspension of execution, will first determine whether President Yoon's'irreparable damage' is a key issue.
The Seoul Administrative Court admitted that, on the 1st, the 4th Department of the Administration made a decision to cite some of Mr. Yoon's request for suspension of the exclusion of duties.
It is also possible that this logic will be applied to this trial.
On the other hand, it is pointed out that the'significant impact on public welfare', which threatens the fairness of the disciplinary action imposed by the Ministry of Justice, can be an important variable in judgment, unlike the previous case of suspension of execution of job exclusion.
In the case of job exclusion, the effect of maintaining the job for a very short period of time before the disciplinary decision was made when citing suspension of execution, but this suspension disposition will result in loss of the entire effect of the suspension of the suspension by maintaining the job for two months, the period of suspension when citing suspension of execution There is a difference.
However, the Ministry of Justice in the case of exclusion from duties saw that the exclusion of Mr. Yoon's duties could cause confusion in the operation of the entire prosecutor's office and the performance of prosecution officials as a threat to public welfare.
In the end, the court is expected to make a decision by comparing the public welfare claimed by the Ministry of Justice with the irreparable damage claimed by Yoon.
During next week's interrogation, Mr. Yun seems to be working hard to prove the procedural injustice of the discipline.
On the other hand, it is expected that the Ministry of Justice will proclaim that the disciplinary action was legally carried out at the disciplinary committee's decision and the President's home.
(Photo = Courtesy of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, Yonhap News)