<Anchor>



Five witnesses appeared on the disciplinary committee of the Ministry of Justice, which lasted more than 17 hours.

In the process of witness interrogation, fierce battles followed, and new contents were also disclosed. I did.

In addition, it is known that the prosecutor's office at the Ministry of Justice Shim Jae-cheol, who was initially adopted as a witness and then withdrawn, insisted that if Yun becomes president, the prosecutor's office would become dictatorship.



For more details, reporter Kang Cheong-wan will deliver.



<Reporter>



Shim Jae-cheol, the prosecutor's office chief of the Ministry of Justice, was designated as the informant of the'Judge Inspection Suspicion Document', which is the reason for the disciplinary action of President Yoon Suk-yeol.



As the disciplinary committee withdrew the adoption of witnesses, it made comments in writing.



In his opinion, Director Shim is known to have insisted that "if the leader of a private organization becomes president, it will be a great misfortune for our people and it will be a more terrifying prosecution dictatorship than the military dictatorship."



It is also said that Yoon, the head of the Public Investigation Department, Dongbu District Prosecutors' Office, Kim Kwan-jeong, and the Supreme Prosecutor's Office, Lee Jung-hyun, who are classified as pro-government tendencies, also reportedly issued a letter of opinion to the effect that Yoon interfered with the investigation of the alleged attempts to force Channel A.



However, it was confirmed that Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who participated in the prosecution, gave the opposite testimony to the disciplinary committee that the investigation of the Channel A case itself was not properly conducted.



In March, MBC reported a suspicion that Channel A reporter and Prosecutor Han Dong-hoon had threatened former Value Invest Korea representative Lee Chul, but in February, before the point that there was a threat, MBC reporter and informant X Even though the investigation team secured the call record, it was not properly investigated.



The prosecutor testified that if informant X spoke with MBC reporter before or after contacting the Channel A reporter, there was a possibility of a conspiracy, and the allegation itself may not be established. Is known to be.



This prosecutor is also known to have testified that the prosecutor who expressed the opinion that this part should be investigated was excluded from the investigation team, and it is expected to have a wave of waves.



(Video coverage: Seol Min-hwan, video editing: Won-hee Won) 



▶ Yoon Seok-yeol "Illegal Action, Correction"…

Signs of prosecution backlash


▶ "The reasons for prosecution reform become clear" vs.