<Anchor>



Along with the trial on the 30th, there is an inspection committee scheduled for tomorrow and a disciplinary review committee for the day after tomorrow. At the beginning of this week, various schedules related to the succession of President Yoon are held one after another.

In this situation, a prosecutor who was in charge of the investigation by President Yoon yesterday reported that the alleged document of the judge's inspection was not guilty, but controversy is arising by revealing that the part has been deleted from the report.



Reporter Kang Cheong-wan reports.



<Reporter>



Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who was dispatched to the Prosecutor's Office of the Ministry of Justice and supervised Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol, posted a post on the prosecution's internal network yesterday.



The prosecutor said that he was in charge of reviewing the jurisprudence of the so-called'judge's suspicion' document, which is a key issue among the reasons for disciplining the president.



This prosecutor said that the results of other prosecutors' review were not different from their own conclusions, so they were attached to the record as they were, but even though they were not urged to review their opinions, the part of the report that was incompatible with the request for investigation was deleted without explanation. .



In light of this, the prosecutor insisted that the decision to request an investigation against President Yoon was not based on the results of a reasonable legal review, and that the procedure was also illegal.



Even though the prosecutor in charge of the alleged document of the judge's inspection reported that it was not guilty, it was revealed that the upper line had dismissed it.



The Office of the Prosecutor's Office of the Ministry of Justice refuted that part of the report has never been deleted, and that the legal review report finalized by the dispatched prosecutor was attached to the inspection record.



As this is an explanation contrary to the prosecution's allegation, there are voices that the prosecution must reveal the substantive truth through investigation.



Ahead of the following meetings of the Justice Department's Prosecutors' Commission and the Disciplinary Commission this week, the exposure of the prosecutor in charge of the prosecutor's office is expected to increase.