It is expected that the suspension of execution of the effect of the exclusion of duties by Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol at the Seoul Administrative Court held the day after tomorrow will be a watershed in the conflict between Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and President Yoon.



In response to Minister Chu's dismissal from his duties, the hearing on the suspension of execution requested by President Yoon will be held at 11 am on the 30th at the hearing of the 4th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Deputy Judge Cho Mi-yeon).



Unlike the main lawsuit in which the details are correct and wrong, the suspension of execution trial focuses on whether or not'hard to recover damage' has occurred to President Yoon as a result of the exclusion of the job.



In addition, there is a high possibility that the hearing will be given weight to whether the dismissal of the job has been carried out in accordance with the legal procedure.



Even if the court decides on the day of the trial and returns President Yun to his office, if the disciplinary committee held two days after the interrogation decides on severe disciplinary action, such as dismissal, dismissal, or suspension, President Yoon will be excluded from his duties again.



The court decided on the court in charge yesterday, two days after President Yoon's request for suspension of execution, and the court in charge of the day quickly set a date for questioning.



As such, it is observed that the court will proceed with the hearing as quickly as possible in recognition of the importance and urgency of the matter.



Accordingly, there are many expectations that the decision of the court will be made as early as the day of the interrogation, or the next day at the latest.



However, the possibility of a hearing delay cannot be ruled out as the time to review the records is limited in light of the size and severity of the case.



If the judge fails to make a decision prior to the disciplinary action, the judgment may be dismissed because the judgment is not profitable.



In this case, according to the result of the disciplinary action, the court may enter the second round of the court battle as Yoon filed an additional lawsuit for cancellation of the disciplinary action and an additional application for suspension of enforcement.