<Anchor> Over the



suspicion of inspecting judges, the Democratic Party criticized it as a challenge to the rule of law, saying that the prosecution routinely inspected judges.

Therefore, the power of the people asked for the verification of the confiscated material, saying that the Ministry of Justice was driving the confiscated material to the temple to cover it, as there were information about the passport personnel in the confiscated material related to President Yoon Seok-yeol.



Reporter Kim Soo-young organized the political battle.



<Reporter> The



Democratic Party, which designated the prosecution's document that investigated the propensity of judges as a'judge's inspection', argued that this was a challenge to the rule of law and a major issue that shakes the foundation of democracy.



The prosecution was systematically collecting and managing it, but it was not even recognized as illegal.



[Lee Nak-yeon/Democratic Party Representative: The disciplinary procedure of the Ministry of Justice for the person in charge should also be implemented promptly and strictly.]



Some Democratic Party lawmakers argued that the judge's inspection could be the tip of the iceberg. They also raised their voices saying that they should investigate.



The people's power claimed that the document was only analyzed by the court, and that the Ministry of Justice exaggerated it with an inspection to stimulate the court.



[Ho-Young Joo/People's Power, Representative: Isn't it rudeness to the court that the prosecutor who enters the trial without knowing who the judge is at all?]



The people's power also raised suspicion that the Ministry of Justice turned normal documents into illegal inspections in order to cover this, because the confiscated material secured by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office during the inspection process by Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol also included passport personnel intelligence.



At the same time, the opposition parties demanded that the confiscations be verified together.



However, the Supreme Prosecutor's Office refuted that it had not confiscated'investigative intelligence for influential passport personnel'.



Meanwhile, the Power of the People and the National Assembly submitted a request for a national politics investigation to the National Assembly today, asking the National Assembly to examine the contents of the disciplinary proceedings with the exclusion of President Yoon from the duties.



(Video coverage: Park Jin-ho·Kim Hyun-sang, video editing: Lee So-young)



▶ On the 30th,'Suk-yeol Yoon's return' will be questioned...

Conclusion before the disciplinary committee


▶ Mi-ae Chu "Proceeds disciplinary action, Seok-yeol Yoon"…

Denial of Prosecutors' Request