<Anchor>
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae has decided to hold the Disciplinary Review Committee of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol on the second Wednesday of the following month.
Regarding the suspicion of the judiciary's inspection, the Supreme Prosecutor's Office also asked the Supreme Prosecutors to investigate the case, and Yoon's side disclosed the document at all yesterday (26th) and confronted it with a lawsuit to cancel the exclusion.
Reporter Won Jong-jin reports.
<Reporter>
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae said that a disciplinary committee will be held on the 2nd of next month to deliberate whether or not to punish President Yoon Seok-yeol.
The disciplinary committee, consisting of 7 members in total, consists of Minister Chu, the Vice Minister of Justice, two prosecutors appointed or commissioned by Minister Chu, a lawyer, and a law professor.
The Ministry of Justice also stated that it had requested an investigation by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office on charges of obstructing the exercise of the right to abuse of authority, saying that all the contents of the inspection documents were illegal results.
Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol filed a lawsuit yesterday afternoon with the Seoul Administrative Court to cancel the suspension.
Yoon refuted the six reasons for the disciplinary action of Minister Chu Mi-ae in the war, and argued that it could not be a reason for suspension of office execution.
Among the reasons for disciplinary action proposed by the Ministry of Justice, the so-called ``document of suspicion by the court of justice'', which became a key issue, was also disclosed.
In the case of former Supreme Court Justice Yang Seung-tae, who became the core of the controversy in the inspectorate by being listed as a ``water story judge,'' the brief description of the 2016 list of water story judges included in the administrative office, and the fact that it was reported to the media because he did not attend a warrant interrogation while on duty in the past holiday. Written on it.
In addition, the presiding judge in the case of the former Minister Cho Kook is from the Korean Law Research Association, but it is stated that it is the sister-in-law of a prosecutor's officer in the special matters section along with the comment that it is reasonable.
In this regard, attorney Wan-gyu Lee, who represents Yun, said that if you look at the document, you can see that it is not a temple at all, so let's leave it to the commonsense judgment of the general public.