<The Anchor> The

Supreme Prosecutors' Office issued a brief entry regarding the Channel A case. Yesterday (8th), the proposal was made by the Minister of Justice Yoon Suk-Yeol, which was first proposed by the Ministry of Justice.

Reporter Bae Joon-woo, there is a refutation following the rebuttal, please explain in detail.

<Reporter> 

Yes, it is. The Greatsword just gave me one explanation.

Yesterday, at around 6 pm, there was a proposition proposed by Secretary General Seok-Yeol Yun to Minister Chu Mi-ae, which was suggested by the Ministry of Justice, and was asked to make public recommendations from the Ministry of Justice.

Earlier yesterday, Choo rejected President Yoon's recommendation less than two hours later, and the Greatsword explained the self-reported papers ahead of the ultimatum time at 10 am today.

It was known that Kim Young-dae, the Seoul High Prosecutor's Office, was proposed by the Attorney General's Office of Justice.

In addition, this explanatory document also contains this. After Choo initiated the investigation command related to the Channel A case, President Yoon was deprived of command only in the case of the Channel A case, and as a result, the central prosecutor was responsible for the investigation.

He also added that he had notified the central prosecutor of the matter a while ago.

<Anchor>

Then, what is your position with the Ministry of Justice?

<Reporter>

Yes, if you listen to the Justice Department's explanation, it is denied that it is "not true" that you attempted to compromise on a sword.

Although the prosecutor made a proposal first, it was not reviewed by the Ministry of Justice staff and reported to the Minister.

And "I have never suggested to install an independent investigation headquarters." He explained, "It is Mansitan, but I can still let the Central Prosecutors investigate independently, so I can expect a fair investigation."