Nowadays, Incheon International Airport Corporation sends elucidating data about media reports to reporters once a day.

Yesterday (1st), two explanations were submitted. This was a refutation of the article that the Chosun Ilbo reported on, '4,800 full-time employees in 4 years, Incheon Airport, 1 new recruit this year', and Hankyoreh's article'Incheon Airport Corporation's 3 years of regular job promotion, what happened there' .

Both reports were eye-catching. Among them, the Hankyoreh report was more noticeable because it was similar to the report file I wrote two days ago (▶ Incheon Airport, why I was angry: a broken pen? A broken agreement and Mercury's promise). In particular, Incheon International Airport picked up a paragraph from the Hankyoreh article and replied directly.

A labor worker who knows the situation of Incheon Airport's regular employment, said, "From the beginning, not only the regular workers but also the corporations were directly opposed to employment." He took the time during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd meetings and interpreted that in April, the ruling party won a victory in the general elections, making it impossible to postpone the decision.
-Hankyore 20.06.30. [News AS] Incheon Airport Corporation's 3 years of regularization promotion What happened there?
Reporter Kim Yang-jin-

Incheon Airport said that the announcement of the transition to regular jobs, which was the starting point of public opinion conflict, was irrelevant to the'winning general election'. Through the discussions and coordination about 130 times with various stakeholders such as the KCTU and the KCTU, the legal issues related to direct employment were announced several times through external legal advice and consultation with related organizations at the 3rd Labor-Management Council. I did it.

The above explanation looks like a dodol table. Incheon Airport continues to say, "We have had sufficient consultations with stakeholders, and since the 1st Labor-Management Agreement in 2017, security screening agents and others have been agreed on targets for direct employment at the head office. . However, other stakeholders, such as the regular workers' union, the Democratic Union's non-regular workers' union, the Korean Union's workers' irregular workers' union, and the security screening union's union, are raising concerns about the justification of the process depending on whether they agree to the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd agreements.

In particular, there is a point where the claims of the regular workers union and Incheon Airport Corporation are in conflict. "The 1,902 security screening personnel are separate companies considering the legal issues are resolved, and they are organized and operated separately from other jobs in a business division system."

Let me briefly explain again. Security screening personnel at airports need to carry weapons, and as they are national security facilities, sanctions are required for strike activities such as strikes. However, in order for the Airport Corporation to directly hire such security personnel, it must be hired as a'special security guard'. However, under the current airport law or security business law, Incheon Airport cannot directly hire a special security guard. As a result, Incheon Airport received legal advice from Kim & Chang, a law firm, and Barun, a law firm last year, and the law firms offer to hire directly as a petitioner who doesn't need to fix the law, either 1) to fix the law.

● After two months, the plan for hiring a petitioner for Cheongwon Police was overturned

. Unlike the special security guard, the petition police system has been pointed out several times in the Incheon Airport Corporation's internal review report and in April this year, the law firm Barun's service report.

On December 26, last year, the 16th working council analyzed that as a result of aging, bureaucracy, and increased cost burdens, petition police are tending to be replaced by special guards and are not in line with the current national policy direction to reduce petition police.

In the document'Report on follow-up related to the agreement of the 3rd Labor-Management Council' that came out in April this year, the law was revised to say that it is necessary to hire as a special security guard. Accordingly, the period for reviewing the revised legislation and promoting the legislative legislation is indicated from April to December. The goal is to achieve the job employment promised three years ago by revising the law gradually from April.

But it's Monday, June 22nd, two months later. Incheon Airport Corporation announces that it will use the 1,902 security screening personnel as security officers, not as special guards, saying that it will mark the end of the transition to regular jobs.

In the meantime, the special security guard reviewed the reorganization of the law that can be employed, but
1) can shake the foundation of the security business law system that presupposes a'contract contract' and
2) unlike other airports that hired petition police, only Incheon Airport is a security officer as a security guard.
Explains the reason for abandoning the reorganization of the law, saying that if employment is carried out, special operations such as airport operation and service are the main tasks or tasks assigned to the basic role or mission.

The full-time union rebelled. The employment of the Cheongwon Police Road was not in the first place in the first place, and as you saw earlier, Incheon Airport Corporation itself had not seen it until April. The union said they had no idea whether the petition was to be chosen. I wondered if there were any documents that suggested reasons not to revise the law, such as 1), 2), and 3) above, but I couldn't find them in documents published outside.

In the report on the legal advisory service of Barun, a law firm in April of this year, "The petition police cannot be an appropriate method for various reasons. Let's revise the Aviation Security Act or the Security Industry Act or the Incheon International Airport Corporation Act so that we can hire you as a special security guard." I suggest. There were no statements to point out the problem or not to amend the law.

The rush was long. Last week, a full-time union said in a press release, "Incheon Airport Corporation announced another week of legal advice overturning the results of the existing advisory, and a week later announced the transition to full-time employment." I was curious what the new legal advice would be.

In the Office of the Future United Party's Representative Tae-kyung Ha, Incheon Airport Corporation asked for a questionnaire and its response to the law firm.

● Announcement of transition to full-time job D-6: Incheon Airport sends legal advice to law firm A.

Many of the 1,902 security screening personnel announced by Incheon Airport Corporation were in the process of re- signing at the end of June. The proposal to organize security screening agents into subsidiaries was stated in the third agreement. Afterwards, I'm going to take steps to resolve the legal issues step by step, but I don't know what the reason is, but I think Incheon Airport Corporation had to finalize the specific employment plan before June.

In addition, the plan will be revealed in detail in the questionnaire and answer that Incheon Airport shared with A Law Firm just six days before the announcement date of the transition to full-time on June 22.

On June 16, Airport Corporation made a legal inquiry regarding the'security search staff conversion method' to law firm A. In the questionnaire, Incheon Airport Corporation explained that it is difficult to work as a special security guard status under the current law, saying that it is pursuing the transition to over 10,000 regular workers in accordance with the government's policy to convert non-regular workers from 2017.

In addition, he explains the results of the legal advisory services in April (which stands for Barun's service report), and explains, "It is necessary to maintain the security guard's status as a special security guard in order to secure the airport protection system and operate the airport in a stable manner." In addition, he explained, "To this end, the revision of the Airport Construction Act or Aviation Security Act is appropriate." Let’s look at the phrase.

Next is the'expected problem when amending the law', which is the key and the reason for writing this report file. Incheon International Airport Corporation 1) Expected difficulties in the legislative process 2) Explained that it was an exception that shook the foundation of the security business law system at a related party meeting and was concerned about problems such as impeding legal stability.

The related party meeting here refers to a meeting involving the Incheon Airport Corporation, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the National Police Agency, the Ministry of National Defense, and the National Intelligence Service. It was the first time that the direction of the discussion at the related agency meeting, which had not been able to know what was going on since April, was confirmed.

The reason for the backlash of regular workers is also at this point. He said he didn't know about the points of discussion because he was expecting difficulties in the legislative process and there was actually a problem in hiring as a special security guard through the revision of the law, which was considered as the first priority. It is said that it was completely different from the plan to promote law revision and legislative legislation from April to December this year.

● Announcement of the transition to full-time employment D-4:

Shall we look at the answer sheet that says “For the hopeless amendment of law” and “For a smooth labor-management relationship” ? Two days later, on June 18, Law Firm A sent a response to the legal review to Incheon International Airport Corporation. This was also provided by Ha Tae-kyung's office.

A Legal Affairs Corporation analyzes the three possible alternatives (Revised Incheon Airport Corporation Act/Revised Aviation Security Act/Revised Security Industry Act). He explained that the Aviation Security Act and the Security Industry Act are expected to have a backlash because they can affect other airports and security companies. In the meantime, I recommend the method, as it is easy to promote revision and minimize the impact on other organizations for how to place special rules on security screening in the Incheon Airport Corporation Act.

In the next paragraph, it is possible to directly hire a petitioner without amendment to the law. 1) Compare the amendment to the law and 2) the petition. A Law firms also cited bureaucratization and aging, which were previously considered as disadvantages of the petition police system, and admit that the amendment to the law is a better option. However, even if the law is being revised, issues such as whether and when it is revised are pointed out. At the

end of the answer, the law firm said, “The law revision is very unclear, and the security service agent's existing service contract has not expired for less than a month. "It is not appropriate for a smooth labor-management relationship to take an unpredictable option." Finally, it was a recommendation to hire a job as a petitioner.

Although it is not possible to transfer the entire response of the A corporation, due to the amount of the report file, it appears that the corporation A has sufficiently undergone various legal amendments and petitions, such as the petition for police, at the request of Incheon International Airport Corporation. It seems that the proper plan was presented in a reasonable manner according to the realistic conditions of the Incheon Airport Corporation.

On the other hand, on the other hand, I can't erase the idea that Incheon Airport has secured an answer that legally supports the logic of hiring as a petition police officer that takes little time and can proceed without conditions . A Just four days after receiving the response from the law firm, the'Securities Screening Agent Conversion Announcement' was held.

Of course, the policy to push for amendments to the law, which was set in April, can be changed to achieve the general goal of regularization of non-regular workers. However, if we go back to the reason why the voices and angers of many stakeholders related to Incheon Airport have been bursting in the past 10 days in our society, it can be summarized that there were stakeholders who were excluded from the decision process. This is the reason why Incheon Airport Corporation's decision is'decision', but from the perspective of stakeholders such as the trade unions who oppose it, the criticism of'staff administration' appears in'the blink decision'.

● Announcement of Conversion to Full-time D+10: Conflict still remains there. In

this interview file, we analyzed the background of the union's claim to revoke the agreement after the final announcement of Incheon Airport's transition to full-time on the 22nd of this month. I quoted a verse from another journalist's article at the end of the report, but it is only a speculation and interpretation, and IIAC would have done my best to keep the promise of the people three years ago. So maybe I didn't choose the long time-consuming route to tackle legal problems, but I didn't want to choose the'Petition Police Plan' that could solve the job offer at once. Until we announce this decision as far as possible.

The transition to a regular job at Incheon Airport has been completed for three years. However, the conflict is ongoing. Yesterday (June 30) The unions A and B of Security Screening Agents, which had to renew their subsidiary contracts, suspended the contract. Branches A and B stated that Incheon Airport Corporation was temporarily interim with the expenses of Incheon Airport before being hired directly, but the union claimed that the probation period was unfairly set in the labor contract itself and that the scope of work was incorrect. In addition, the A and B branches continued to negotiate, saying that they did not agree with the provisional provisions during the 3rd meeting in February this year.

The hiring process is also an issue when hiring in the future. Since May 12, 2017, non-regular workers at Incheon Airport have to go through open competitive recruitment. The union demands remedies in the event of a dropout. The knot that Incheon International Airport Corporation has to solve is still left.