<Anchor>

Last year, the city of Seoul was hiring open civil servants, and several violations of the regulations were caught. Suddenly changing the selection committee members that had been decided in advance, or knowing about the candidates, they joined the committee members who applied for evasion.

Reporter Kwan-Jin Kim was the sole reporter.

<Reporter>

Seoul City publicly recruited one public official at the beginning of last year.

The selection committee was composed of two people, two inside Seoul and four outside.

If you look at the scoring history of 5 applicants obtained by SBS, 1 external committee member scored 0 for all items of applicant 1.


Of course, it was a dropout according to the score, but the final winner was the first applicant.

How did it go?

If there is a possibility of harming the fairness of the examination under the Seoul Metropolitan Government's Personnel Regulations, the committee members must leave the applicants themselves.

The committee member, who had known the applicant with number 1, said he would drop out of the committee because of the fairness of the evaluation.

[Seoul City officials: If you receive an application for evasion, you must appoint another member if it is justified by the Seoul Metropolitan Government's Personnel Regulations.]

However, the Seoul City Government said that it is only necessary to evaluate the applicants . The applicant has 0 points.

Applicants 1 were evaluated with the average score of 5 members, and the remaining 4 applicants with the average score of 6 members.

In addition, the evaluation method for each applicant was different, and in the case of applicant 1, only 2 internal members and 3 external committee members participated in the evaluation, and it violated the purpose of having more than 2/3 of the selection committee members outside.


There is another problem.

The Seoul Metropolitan Government suddenly replaced one internal committee member, who was previously determined, who was in business relationship with applicant 1.

[Replaced internal committee member: (By regulation, I can't talk about the interview.) I would like your understanding.]

However, he emphasized that the judges had been judged fairly according to laws and principles.

A Seoul official who was in charge of this issue said that three out of six members were acquainted with applicant 1.

Seoul City did not answer specific questions, such as violation of regulations, even though the city audit committee concluded that there was no problem.

The final candidate, No. 1, said he had only met once or twice with an internal member who was replaced.

(Video coverage: Bae Moonsan, video editing: Park Jeong-sam)