The incumbent vice chief judge has criticized the government's ruling party recently for banning North Korea's war against North Korea or for preventing the distortion of history.

Yesterday (22th), when Kim Tae-gyu, the deputy chief judge of Busan District Court, posted on his social networking service (SNS) account, criticized the government's response to North Korea's response to North Korea as "infringement of freedom of expression and unclear legal basis" I did.

Earlier, the Ministry of Unification reported on the 11th that the Free North Korean Movement Association and the Big Sam had violated the Inter-Korean Exchange Cooperation Act and the Aviation Safety Act in the process of distributing leaflets and rice bottles to North Korea.

Judge Kim pointed out that the spread of North Korean flyers was a “freedom of expression” event held by North Korean refugee groups, and pointed out that there is no clear legal basis to limit this.

Judge Kim asserted that "the government seems to be based on Article 13 of the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act, but it is dangerous to bring in the law for economic cooperation and exchange to limit freedom of expression."

Judge Kim said, "In applying the law, what we should never do is set a purpose or intention and draw appropriate legal provisions to it." "You have to look at the nature of the regime and learn its policies."

In addition, with respect to the anti-distortion law initiated by Democratic Party Democrats alongside Yang Hyang-ja, the approach to “define one historical fact as justice and tolerate without punishing any perception and assertion of facts placed therein” may be an extremely non-democratic and dictatorial self-righteous approach. "The measure itself could be a serious ignorance of the Korean people," he said.

(Photo = Yonhap News)