Son Jung-woo, operator of the world's largest child sexual exploitation site'Welcome to Video', is screened on the 16th two days later.

The 20th Seoul Metropolitan Criminal Detective (Deputy Judge Kang Young-soo, Jung Moon-gyeong and Jae-chan Lee) will hold the second interrogation date for the US humanitarian review on the 16th.

It is likely that a decision will be made as to whether or not to return immediately after the interrogation.

The issue of the second interrogation is likely to be the part that the prosecution has not prosecuted for accusations of stealing criminal proceeds when investigating past sons for production and distribution of pornography.

At the first hearing on the 19th of last month, the court asked to explain this later.

Son was charged with extradition for'international money laundering' in accordance with the treaty between Korea and the United States.

Then, his father, 54-year-old Son Mo, sued the prosecution for his son, saying that he must prosecute South Korea for punishment because the prosecution has not prosecuted him in the past.

The allegations of the Crime Revenue Concealment Act applied when Father Son sued his son are the same as the three alleged money laundering among the nine charges that the United States Supreme Court filed when he prosecuted Son in August 2018.
For this reason, it has been pointed out in the legal world that the father is a trick to stop his son from returning to the United States.

If the prosecution prosecutes Mr. Son for alleged concealment of criminal proceeds, it will not be reimbursed for'absolute refusal reasons' under the extradition law.

Son was scheduled to go to prison at the end of April this year after being sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison for alleged distribution of sexual exploitation.

In Korea, the same charges are not punished again, but the statute of limitations related to the stealing of criminal proceeds is until 2023.

The case has now been assigned to the Seoul Central District Attorney's Detective Division 4 (New Type Manager).

Prosecutors say there is no need to start an investigation right away because the court is conducting an extradition process.

At the beginning of the 2018 investigation, the prosecution secured an account transaction history in the name of the cryptocurrency exchange used by Son and his father's name, and compared and analyzed it to understand the overall flow of funds, such as Bitcoin.

The prosecution confirmed that Mr. Son focused on investing in criminal return and confiscation and collection, confirming that he had received over 660 million won worth of Bitcoin and sold sexual exploits over 7,293 times.

The alleged money laundering charges for extradition were not within the scope of the investigation.

Therefore, the prosecution did not check the history or motive of the use of a nominee account or account against Mr. Son or his father, and did not investigate the part of cashing in Bitcoin.

Accordingly, the Seoul Metropolitan Prosecutors' Office for Women and Children's Crimes Indicted Son in March 2018 only for allegedly producing and distributing pornography under the Youth Sex Protection Act and for distributing pornography under the Information and Communication Network Act.

The prosecution's position is that Mr. Son's crimes will be handed over to the United States for punishment of money laundering that has not yet been punished in Korea.

However, Mr. Son claims that the prosecution also investigated this part at the time, but there was insufficient evidence to prosecute it.

Also, the complaint has been filed with the prosecution this time, and if you are suspected, you will be punished in Korea.

On the 12th, Ms. Son also filed a petition to the court to insist that "In the past, all the crimes were confessed by an investigative agency. We are sorry for the wrongdoing. Please be punished in Korea."

Son, who was absent during the first interrogation, plans to attend the second interrogation and reveal his position.

In a recent statement to the Justice Department, the prosecution is said to have said that Mr. Son committed a crime against humanity for child sexual exploitation, and that the jurisdiction of crimes had to take place across many countries and that the jurisdiction should be repatriated to the United States.

In addition, Mr. Son is said to have had a problem with the process being duplicated when a new investigation is undertaken because he has already been prosecuted by the U.S. federal jury and accused the United States of gathering considerable evidence.

In particular, the prosecution is known to have emphasized that there is a possibility of diplomatic friction as the result of'Forum Shopping', which chooses a court that is advantageous to him, if he avoids repatriation by asking others around him to sue.

On the other hand, Mr. Son said that in the opinion, the prosecutors alleged that they had investigated the alleged crime-concealing charges and omitted the prosecution.

In addition, it was reported that Mr. Son confessed all the facts regarding the stealing of crime profits in the police and prosecution investigations and cooperated with the investigation, and that it was said that repatriation was not desirable based on the fact that all the evidence was found in the investigation.

In addition, it is said that Mr. Son has appealed to guarantee basic rights in the Constitution based on the fact that Mr. Son has never been abroad and cannot speak English, so it is difficult to properly secure the right to defend in a lawsuit.