The

fact that SBS is doing a fact check on <Anchor> is that the team has been talking about various testimonies related to this democratization movement over the past three days. Laws are now being debated to stop these malicious distortions and punishments.

Reporter Kyung-Won Lee put together how other countries are dealing with similar issues.

<Reporter>

Germany did not massacre the Jews, the Holocaust was fabricated. Germany's 1929 Ursula Harperbeck and Nazi Granny, who were allegedly claimed, became a major controversy in German society. Was sentenced to.We also had discussions about making similar laws when the May 18 related rumors hit the board.

German history fraud, not under special law, is provided in Article 130 (3) of the Criminal Code.

However, this provision is part of a mass sedition that punishes hate against certain groups or minorities.This implies that historical injustice will lead to discrimination, hate, and violence against holocaust victims.

It was also because of the fact that Harperbeck's grandmother was punished by continuing to provide the Jewish hateful logic to the far right, eventually harming public peace.

Many critics also point out that the punishment for the May 18 testimonies should lead to historical injustices leading to attacks on victims as well as hatred and discrimination in certain areas.

[Hong Sung-soo / Professor of Law, Sookmyung Women's University: Let's regulate all the acts of history distortion, let's punish them all, not to say this, but (5 · 18 history distortion) has the effect of strengthening discrimination and hate against the victim group. (I think this is a necessary distortion of history.) In

fact, the team analyzes the purpose of the 11th May 18th History Distortion Punishment Act proposed by the National Assembly, distorting history, fabricating the facts, 5 · 18 Most of the content is to punish a person for defamation.

At the time of the initiative, it also had an effect on which side of parliamentary power was in effect, but it was repealed or was to be retired once or twice after hearing that it was in conflict with freedom of expression.

It is the team's conclusion that the May 18 of Immortality must be different.

It is necessary to make clear that the purpose of legislation is due to aversion, and to establish concrete standards for hate, discrimination and damage even in sub-statutes.

(Video editing: Seonghoon Jeong, CG: Announcement)