Facebook will not submit the statements of politicians to "fact-checking", the verification process of questionable information, said Tuesday the social network, launched in a crusade to restore confidence after a series of attempts to manipulate public opinion via its platform. "We do not think it's appropriate for us to act as the arbiter of political debates and to prevent a politician's speech from reaching its audience," said Nick Clegg, world director of public affairs for the United States. American giant, in an online statement. "This means we will not send original content or advertising published by politicians to our fact-checking partners for review," he clarified.
The social network, overwhelmed by the spread of false information ("fake news"), which undermine democratic debates, particularly in the context of elections, has set up a partnership with media organizations (including AFP) to verify articles and posts suspected of spreading infox. Refinements of journalists from these media are then displayed just below the offending content when they are visible on the platform, with an indication of their doubtful nature. Not including messages from politicians has been part of the network's rules for a year, writes Nick Clegg.
Facebook is trying to improve its image
It states, however, that "when a political figure shares previously denied content, including links, videos, and photos, we intend to demote that content, post the related information of the partner journalists, and prevent their integration into advertisements ". The former British Deputy Prime Minister joined Facebook less than a year ago to help fix his scandal-stricken image. In 2016, Russian-based manipulation campaigns had used social media to try to influence their users during polls in the United Kingdom and the United States. These political operations had notably resorted to the spread of fake news.
But the network giant is on a tightrope between preserving freedom of expression and regulating inappropriate content (misinformation, incitement to hatred and terrorism, etc.). Despite new measures to increase transparency, especially around political ads, Mark Zuckerberg's group remains under fire in the United States, coming as well from some Democrats, who find that the giants of tech have become too powerful , that of Republicans, starting with President Donald Trump, who regularly accuses social networks of censoring conservative voices.