<Anchor>

This is the image of the so-called "gomtang" house. The man was accused of touched the body of the woman who passed by in the restaurant within 1.3 seconds. The man pleaded that he could not do it in 1.3 seconds, but he was convicted of pledging at first and second. However, the Supreme Court has made another decision on other allegations of sexual abuse in the last 1.4 seconds. Let's see what the difference is in the two cases.

I am a reporter.

<Reporter>

In March 2017, Mr. A reported on the charges of sexual harassment that Mr. B, who was following his bus, grabbed his butt and pulled his clothes.

Mr. B, who was drunk, replied that he had stabbed Mr. A's clothes while his body was moving forward.

The first and second trial courts sentenced B to a fine of 5 million won, saying, "The victim's statement is consistent, and witness statements and black box images are used to confirm sexual abuse."

However, the Supreme Court overturned the decision on October 4 and returned the case to the public for not guilty.

The black box image of the bus, which became the core evidence of sexual harassment at the court, was the decisive reason for the innocence.

In the black box video, Mr. B stretched his hand forward and took 1.4 seconds to reach back to the victim.

The Supreme Court explained the reason for the dismissal, saying, "It is physically possible to stretch your hands in 1.4 seconds to grab your buttocks, then take your hands off and pull your clothes back with the same hand."

The so-called "gomtang house sexual harassment" case, in which sexual harassment was recognized up to the previous 2 seams, was similar to the 1.3 seconds in sexual harassment, but the conclusion was completely different.

Both cases have images at the time of the incident, but it is the same that no direct scenes have been taken to cover sexual harassment.

On the other hand, there is a difference in claiming that in the case of 'gomtang house molestation', there was a movement of holding his butt in 1.3 seconds, while this incident claimed that there were two acts of pulling clothes after catching his buttocks.

The Supreme Court has emphasized the principle of criminal justice that if a suspect is guilty, the judge will not violate the defendant's interests if the evidence is insufficient.

(Image editing: Park Jin-hoon)