SBS reported two suspicions of manipulating a high school tennis division in Seoul through January 8, 8 o'clock news and coverage files. It is a suspicion that the school tennis manager A has manipulated the game in a way that disqualified the student who had played with his son in the preliminary race of the National High School of the National High School in April, A was asked several times for arbitration by the media arbitration committee immediately after the news. However, the court has recognized most of the reported facts as facts.

▶ [Solo] "Forced abstention for director son" Tennis match operation investigation (2018.01.03)
▶ [Report File] The director of the game ... Dumb players (2018.01.05)

The prosecution charged A with two years of jail time. Detective Choi Soon - na (Judge Choi, Yu - Na) in Seoul 's Southern District Court sentenced A to two years' probation. I hope that this will not be repeated anymore and will record the verdicts.
Here is the crime of the court A judge A (hereinafter "defendant"). On April 4, 2017, the defendant told a student (second year high school student) who played with his son in the quarterfinals quarterfinals held by the Seoul Metropolitan City Sports Council on April 4, 2017, "It is agreed between the leaders of each school to advance to the quarter finals. Despite this instruction, the disciples who have confronted their sons have set one set to six to two, two sets to four to three, and the defendant takes his son out of court and abstains.

The court ruled: "If the defendant is selected as a high school tennis player, he will be given a considerable added bonus in college entrance examination, and if he is selected as the '98th National High School Tennis Seoul City Representative' Considering the point, he decided to select his son (3rd grade in high school at that time) as "the 98th National High School Tennis High School Representative in Seoul". In a word, he has committed the game for his son.

According to the prosecution's investigation, the defendant's claim that "when the students of the same school played quarter-finals, the top rankers who were assigned seeds were agreed by the leaders of each school to advance to the quarter finals". Other school coaches who participated in the competition stated that they had not agreed with the accused. The other students from the school showed that they entered the quarter-finals after the normal result of the game despite the fact that they had to compete with each other in the quarter-finals. In addition, the defendant 's decision to advance to the top ranker at the same school in the quarter - finals was confirmed by the Seoul Metropolitan City Sports Council or the board of directors' decision.
The court held that "the defendant's claim is only about whether he or she has conspired with other school coaches to interfere with the work," he said. The fact that athletes' ability to interact with an accidental element determines the victory or defeat, and that no one can certainly predict the outcome in advance is an essential feature of the sport as a whole. It is. The court said, "The crime of this case resulted in the destruction of social trust in the fairness of the national championships, and it is not easy to be guilty as it is the basis of sports based on fair competition."

However, the defendant still appears to have not acknowledged the fault. "The defendant has not refrained from denying the crime of the case, claiming that his act is not a game of action but a legitimate local rule." The defendant and the prosecution both appealed against the first judgment.

I want the director to acknowledge the mistake even now, as judged by the court that the base of sports is based on fair play.