According to police investigation results, there were some deficiencies in the process of dispute investigation of Jeju's 'Unique Case', which was accused of killing and killing her ex-husband.

In response, the National Police Agency explained that it is not the final judgment of the police because the process of law review, etc., remains as a result of factual confirmation of the facts.

According to the police, the police investigation team has recently submitted a report to the investigation bureau.

As soon as the controversy over the investigation of the insolvency proceeded, the fact-finding team made a confirmation of the factual relationship with the related departments of the Jeju Provincial Police Department and the Women's Juvenile Section in Jeju on the 2nd.

The reason for the controversy over the original case is the lack of field preserve, the lack of Zolpidem, and the lack of close proximity to the CCTV.

On May 25, Yongjung Chung murdered her husband Kangmo (36) at a pension in Jocheon-eup, Jeju City, and was charged with allegedly abusing her body.

But the police did not properly preserve the pension site.

The police did not install the police on the scene, and the owner of the house asked the police to clean the inside of the crime scene.

Although the fact-finding team has completed the internal precision test and the blood stain test, it is said that there was a lack of field preservation in the first place because the conclusive evidence may remain.

However, there was no evidence that the room was cleaned, or that the investigation was not disrupted.

In addition, it was not easy to preserve the site because the owner of the house strongly disliked the damage due to the business disruption, and the regulations related to the preservation of the site were ambiguous. I judged.

The fact-finding team also investigated how long the investigators failed to acquire the Zolpidem-related evidence at the time they searched for a custom-defined place of residence.

The investigative team searched the residence on the first day of an emergency arrest on March 1 and secured criminal tools such as blood-stained knives.

However, I did not find a Solfid Kempen.

The person who found the Zolpidem drug is a unique husband.

He is reported to have handed the police a copy of the pill containing the zolpidem in his own pouch.

The truth investigation team reported that the investigation team seemed to have not felt the necessity of thoroughly searching the residence because it had already found the main crime tool and had received a confession of its own definition.

Also, it is also pointed out that the warrant issued by the court was extremely difficult to secure evidence because the range of objects to be seized was extremely limited.

The fact-finding team confirmed the facts about CCTV uncertainty.

The police found the incident site on May 27, when her former husband, Kang, was reported missing, but she could not confirm the contents of the CCTV immediately after confirming the location of the nearby CCTV.

Police have begun analyzing CCTV for crime prevention in the village and it is afternoon of May 28, the next day of reporting.

In order to visit the pension, it is necessary to go through the place where the security CCTV is installed, and the CCTV image can be checked in the police station situation room. It is said that the police first confirmed the security CCTV.

On May 3, the third day of the report, the police checked the CCTV near the pension at the request of the younger brother of Kang and confirmed the behavior that won the unique definition here.

If the police checked the CCTV sooner, the accusation was that it could prevent the corpse.

However, the fact-finding team reported that the first decision was made because it was not a problem that the police focused on the search for missing persons rather than the CCTV confirmation in the absence of the initial criminal clue to report disappearance.

At that time, the police in Jeju began to search for the area around the base station where Kang's cell phone was last turned off, which is the basic procedure for the disappearance investigation.

A police official said, "The results of the investigation of the truth investigation team are not yet definite," he said. "After thorough investigation of the facts and the legal review of the problem, we will comprehensively judge whether the police ' "

(Seoul-Yonhap News)