Arbitration experts reveal 4 indicators that make the use of foreign referees disappear.. They affirm:

Errors in rounds 11 and 12 of the league are acceptable in the absence of the foreign whistle

• Al Ain leads the league by a large margin from its closest competitors.

  From the source

picture

Referee experts and former stadium judges confirmed that the arbitration mistakes during the past two rounds 11 and 12 in the ADNOC Professional Football League are “acceptable” in light of the absence of the foreign whistle during the past two rounds, noting that there are four reasons that will make the clubs’ use of the foreign whistle fade away or less, including the presentation of referees. The local referees have a good level of arbitration, their self-confidence, the presence of a spirit of challenge and competition between them, and their sense of danger, most notably the presence of the foreign whistle as a competitor for them, in addition to the high financial cost of hiring foreign referees “170,000 dirhams per match”, in addition to the gap in the top of the league so far, as Al-Ain leads by a large difference from the nearest His competitors, as well as the lack of video referee interventions this season compared to last season, during which everyone felt that the “mouse” was the one who managed the matches and not the referees present on the field, which led to a large number of club protests.

They told "Emirates Today": "There is a great feeling among the citizen rulers that the presence of the foreign whistle forces them to strive to develop their levels and focus more on managing matches and reducing influential errors, which further enhances the clubs' confidence in the local whistle."

For his part, a member of the former referees committee in the Football Association and the former international referee, Muhammad Al-Junaibi, confirmed: “Arbitration errors are present, but they are generally acceptable,” noting that he asks referees, especially the (mouse) referees, to focus more, stressing the “importance that the policy of (ruling) be The mouse is fixed so that there is a unification of decisions in all matches, and that the referees (the mouse) reach the stage of calling the referees of the arena for the clear cases agreed upon by the referees and not the weak ones such as expulsion and the penalty kick so that the game is not delayed.

Al-Junaibi stressed that "when the rulers of the citizens have the spirit of challenge, confidence, and the spirit of imposing presence, they are good."

Al-Junaibi added: "The referees have reached a stage of maturity that enables them to standardize arbitral decisions."

He pointed out that "the intensity of the competition during the 11th and 12th rounds in the league did not require the clubs to request the use of foreign referees, and the use of foreign referees is when the pressure on the referees increases and arbitration mistakes abound."

In turn, a member of the former FIFA referees committee, former international referee Salah Amin, confirmed that in general, the performance of referees during rounds 11 and 12, which foreign referees were absent, was good, noting that “there were mistakes, but they were not effective, and the level of matches was not It was of a very high standard.”

Salah Amin stressed that “the issue of clubs using foreign referees in the UAE league will disappear and will be just a passing experience for several reasons, including if the national referees provide a good arbitration level, in addition to the high financial cost of 170 thousand dirhams, which will make the clubs distract from the foreign whistle, besides the lack of The referee’s interventions in this season compared to last season, in addition to the fact that each club is allowed to use foreign referees in only two matches in the league, considering that the clubs competing for the championship, if there is a convergence between them in points, it is possible to use foreign referees when the competition approaches from its end.”

Salah Amin added, "I do not think that foreign referees will be used unless the clubs in the second and second places try to catch up with Al Ain or if there are matches between them and Al Ain, but this will be a very small percentage."

He continued, “The arbitration problem last season was the large number of mouse referee interventions, but this season the matter was corrected and you note that there are not many interventions by the video referee,” describing the mouse referee’s interventions in this season so far as reasonable compared to last season.

In turn, the former international referee, Abdullah Al-Ajli, stressed that “the reactions in general about the arbitration performance were normal,” stressing that “the national rulers’ sense of danger and the presence of competition for them by foreign rulers will make them do their best and redouble their efforts.

He added, "The question of whether or not to use foreign referees in our league depends on the level provided by the national stadium judges in the league. Therefore, it is imperative for them to redouble their efforts to prevent the use of foreign referees."

The urgent considered that "the errors affecting the matches will remain, and that the club affected by them will continue to repeat them, while the ordinary errors are ineffective."

The 4 indicators

1- The presence of a spirit of challenge and competition between local rulers and their quest to provide the best.

2- The high financial cost of hiring a foreign referee (170,000 dirhams per match).

3- Al-Ain is far ahead of its closest competitors.

4- Fewer “mouse” interventions this season compared to last season.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news