Today, special sports federations can use 33 percent of the money from the state for whatever they want.
The rest goes to sports associations, is earmarked for various projects or stays within RF's central organization.
- Basically, we want a strong RF.
But we do not want a superstructure.
Today, there are over 800 employees in the joint organization.
We can not really treat ourselves to that, says Anders Larsson.
In a motion that will be presented at the Swedish Sports Confederation this weekend, the ice hockey association, together with 10 other associations, wants to bring about a change.
To begin with, they want to see increased support for the special sports federations by five percentage points.
In the long run, they want a maximum of one-fifth of the state's support for sports to remain within RF's central organization.
In its response to the consultation, the National Sports Board, the RF's decision-making body, largely meets the dissatisfied federations.
There is much to suggest that the part of the cake that the individual federations may decide for themselves will be larger after this weekend's Riksidrottsmöte.
- The National Sports Board wants a little more time, we can buy and understand that.
The important thing now is that we work together and really make sure that this also happens.
It is an important decision at the National Sports Meeting.
But then it will be a workshop, says Anders Larsson.
RF's chairman Björn Eriksson welcomes the discussion
- It is always about finding the common ground.
To do assignments that improve public health and not stand aside from society.
But you should be careful and not undertake the wrong things, says Björn Eriksson, chairman of RF.
Several unions that SVT has been in contact with have expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that RF's administrative organization has grown and uses money that could have gone directly to sports.
- The administrative part must be looked at.
Above all, it is about the fact that there have been a lot of requests to counteract sexual harassment and other things that should be taken into account.
We can easily remove that function, distribute the money so everyone takes care of this best themselves.
It is a balancing act, what is most effective.
There, I think that what the members themselves think plays a big role, says Eriksson.
Javascript is disabled
Javascript must be turned on to play video
Read more about browser support
The browser is not supported
SVT does not support playback in your browser.
We therefore recommend that you switch to another browser.
Read more about browser support
The federations' criticism: RF has become more of a sports authority