Al-Junaibi: The referee confirmed in his report that the player had deliberately collided with him
The "appeal" supports the decision of "discipline" to punish Malaba
Malaba is suspended for 3 matches for assaulting the referee in a controversial collision.
Photography: Osama Abu Ghanem
Adel Al-Junaibi: - “If the clubs adopted the bylaws, then why are the committees’ decisions protested when they are implemented? ”-“ The Discipline and Appeal Committees have no right to discuss the ruling in its report or question it, according to the text of the regulations. ”
picture
The Appeals Committee of the Football Association decided, during its meeting yesterday headed by Counselor Adel Abdullah Al-Junaibi, to support the decision of the Disciplinary Committee, which suspends the player of Ittihad Kalba Club, Beetle Malaba, for three matches, and fined him 50 thousand dirhams, for assaulting the ruling of his team's match against Khorfakkan in the round Past the Gulf Arab League Soccer.
Al-Junaibi told Emirates Today: “Many disagreed about the incident, so I would like to clarify two points in this regard. The first is that we in the legal committees are committed to the principle of impartiality. There is no interference in the work of the committees by any party, whether in the Football Association or Outside it ».
He added: “The second point is that we, as legal committees in the Football Association, are committed to what was stated in the regulations issued by the Federation, and approved by the General Assembly of the Football Association, and the Kalba Club is considered a member of this association, which means that all the regulations have been adopted and approved by the clubs, and therefore it is There is no diligence in the presence of a clear and explicit text. ”
Al-Junaibi explained: “Many are ignorant of the committee’s work mechanism. Rather, some people on social media sites may be insulting in terms that are punishable by law, and in some cases they may reach skepticism about the members’ liabilities, and this is completely unacceptable, but we, as members of these committees, turn a blind eye to these comments. Our appreciation for the enthusiasm of the masses ».
Adel Al-Junaibi continued: “Article 17, Paragraph (D) of the Discipline Regulations stipulated that the referees’ report shall be authentic in relation to accidents that occurred in the stadium, and the committee may consider the match observer’s report or any other reports, and Article 17, paragraph (c) of the regulation The discipline stipulated that the basic principle regarding the facts included in the official reports of the match officials is that they are correct, and whoever claims otherwise is to present evidence that they are incorrect.
Al-Junaibi explained: “The Disciplinary Committee relied on issuing its penalty on the match referee’s report, which explicitly indicated in its report that the player had deliberately collided with him, and whoever claims otherwise must present evidence that it is incorrect, as stipulated in the article, and the Discipline and Appeals Committees are not entitled to Discussing the ruling in his report or questioning it, according to the text of the regulations.
Adel Al-Junaibi stressed that the Football Association does not issue or change the regulations in force on its own, but rather conducts workshops annually to discuss these regulations, and in the presence of representatives of the clubs members of the General Assembly, which adopts at its meeting the amendments to be agreed upon in these workshops .
He called on clubs to study these regulations well, and to propose amendments that they deem appropriate and serve Emirati football.
Al-Junaibi said, "The question here is: If the clubs adopted the bylaws, then why are the committees' decisions protested when applying these regulations correctly and not in violation?"
Adel Al-Junaibi:
"If the clubs have adopted the bylaws, then why are the committees' decisions protested when they are implemented?"
"The Discipline Committee and the Appeals Committee have no right to discuss the judgment in its report or question it, according to the text of the regulations."
Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news