In his statement in the decision, Simon Önerud says that he had a neck protection that is combined with the base.

He points out that the pictures that the disciplinary committee has based on are from the expulsion booth and that it is because he is sitting down that the shirt has gone up so that it covers the neck protection.

"Obviously would have accepted a fine if I had not had a neck protection on me as I think it is very important, but a little hard to go on a fine when I have a neck protection on me and that someone never ever pointed out that I had it in the wrong way ", He writes.

Bertov, for his part, says that he had a dialogue about his neck protection with a judge.

He corrected the protection and then it was approved by the judge.

“I understand if there are also clips that do not make the neck protection visible, as we all know, every change is intense and with a lot of close contact and it may have ended up incorrectly at some sequence.

But throughout the match, I have the neck protection in the same way as Sören approved before the start of the match. ", He writes.

The disciplinary committee has proceeded from SHL's situation room report and concluded that neck protection was worn incorrectly.

- If they have folded them down so they are under the shirt, I can not answer, but they have not worn them in a way that is correct, Ramsay says.

CLIP: Highlights from the SHL premiere between Frölunda and HV71

Javascript is disabled

Javascript must be turned on to play video

Read more about browser support

The browser is not supported

SVT does not support playback in your browser.

We therefore recommend that you switch to another browser.

Read more about browser support

Highlights Frölunda-HV