Lanzhou, May 5 (Cui Lin) "Since 27, Gansu has based on the restructuring of the administrative reconsideration mechanism, system reconstruction, and process reengineering, overcome difficulties, and take the initiative to let the administrative reconsideration 'grow teeth' and exert its power." The Department of Justice of Gansu Province recently gave an interview and described the "Gansu experience" of the reform of the administrative reconsideration system.
In daily life, people inevitably deal with administrative law enforcement. For example, traffic law enforcement to maintain traffic safety and order, urban management law enforcement against roadside indiscriminate behavior, industrial and commercial law enforcement on food quality and safety in restaurants, etc.
In China, administrative reconsideration is a system for resolving administrative disputes within the administrative system. When an administrative dispute arises between a citizen and an administrative organ, in addition to going to court to file a lawsuit, it is also a common choice to "go to court" with the administrative organ and promote the administrative organ's self-correction through administrative reconsideration.
Focusing on the reform goals, Gansu broke the stereotype, established the provincial government administrative reconsideration committee and its office, and established the provincial government administrative reconsideration expert advisory committee composed of 50 experts and the provincial government administrative reconsideration mediation and conciliation committee composed of 30 professional mediators. The city and county levels have established a "1+3" mechanism against the provincial level, realizing the organic unity and efficient operation of administrative reconsideration and decision-making, expert consultation, mediation and reconciliation.
"As the administrative reconsideration bodies of governments at the same level, municipal and county judicial administrative organs have effectively solved the pain points of the people 'looking for multiple heads and running back and forth', and opened up the blocking points that affect the quality of administrative reconsideration cases." According to the Department of Justice of Gansu Province, the good practices and good experience of the reform of the administrative reconsideration system in Gansu Province have been popularized by the Office of the Central Committee for Comprehensive Rule of Law and the Ministry of Justice throughout the country.
"The efficiency and convenience of administrative reconsideration." Liu Ming, the person in charge of the enterprise, has a deep experience. He said that through the administrative reconsideration, it took only 9 days to resolve the administrative dispute that had not been resolved in the previous 7 months, and helped his company recover nearly <> million yuan in economic losses.
It is worth mentioning that the Gansu Provincial Department of Justice has established a collective case-handling model, focusing on the quality and efficiency of case hearing, changing its work methods, and establishing a "three-level case-handling model" of the case trial meeting of the administrative reconsideration committee of the provincial people's government, the case trial meeting of the office of the administrative reconsideration committee of the provincial people's government, and the case review group of the office of the administrative reconsideration committee of the provincial people's government, strengthening the responsibility system for collective case handling of administrative reconsideration and providing an institutional guarantee for ensuring the quality of administrative reconsideration case handling.
During this period, the Gansu Provincial Department of Justice also requested the General Office of the Gansu Provincial Government to issue the "Gansu Provincial Administrative Resumption of Deputies Management Measures (Trial)", establishing a system of unified management of the provincial government and hierarchical appointment of administrative reputants by governments at all levels, and initially established a professional team of 651 professional administrative relegislators.
The relevant person in charge of the Gansu Provincial Department of Justice said that focusing on the responsibility of administrative reconsideration, the department took standardized construction as the carrier to formulate the "Opinions on Comprehensively Strengthening the Standardization of Administrative Reconsideration Work in the Province", sorted out and published 57 demonstration samples of legal documents, compiled and printed typical cases of administrative reconsideration, and put forward unified guiding opinions on Gansu's administrative reconsideration business work, legal documents, and case handling.
At the same time, focusing on the supervision function of administrative reconsideration, the department worked with the procuratorial system to build a "combined policy" for administrative reconsideration to force administration according to law, and formulated a system of administrative reconsideration and a notification system, so that administrative reconsideration can "grow teeth" and exert its power, and further enhance the credibility and authority of administrative reconsideration.
In addition, the Gansu Provincial Department of Justice has also strengthened administrative response work, and jointly with the Office of the Gansu Provincial Committee for Comprehensive Rule of Law and the Gansu Provincial Higher People's Court issued the Guiding Opinions on Doing a Good Job in Appearing in Court to Respond to Litigation by Responsible Persons of Administrative Organs in Enterprise-Related Administrative Litigation Cases, and requested the General Office of the Gansu Provincial Government to issue the Implementation Measures for the Heads of Administrative Organs of Gansu Province to Appear in Court to Respond to Litigation, promoting the realization of 100% of the responsible persons of administrative organs appearing in court to respond to lawsuits. (End)