From a certain perspective, the precise allocation and virtuous circle of some public policies and resources are also important indicators for measuring local governance capabilities.
When relevant localities and departments implement and promote similar work, they should not be satisfied with the aspects of "looking good on the outside" or "giving it to everyone", but should have more embroidery spirit and more responsibility.
"Give full play to the emergency role of low-rent housing and public rental housing for people in urgent need" - According to a report from People's Daily Online on February 19, recently, a netizen from Huo County, Anhui Province left a message on the "Leadership Message Board" of People's Daily Online, suggesting the improvement of low-rent housing The annual review and exit mechanism of public rental housing prevents public rental housing or low-rent housing from being used for self-occupation but private renting for profit or leaving public rental housing idle... The Housing and Urban-Rural Development Department of Anhui Province emphasized in its reply that relevant departments have the responsibility and obligation to Regular spot checks will be carried out on changes in the housing, population, income, and property of affordable housing tenants, which will further improve the dynamic supervision mechanism and strengthen the exit management of public rental housing.
What this suggestion and reminder reflects is the fairness concern of the public in the links of renting and distribution of affordable rental housing in reality.
Indemnificatory rental housing is provided to young urban workers and low-income families. It is a social public policy guarantee and a project that benefits the people.
However, for a period of time, some affordable rental housing in some places have been vacant, occupied, or illegally sublet, and some have even opened mahjong parlors and massage parlors. "Not only violated the original intention and goodwill of the policy, but also chilled the hearts of many groups who should really enjoy this policy.
There are still many similar policy guarantees in reality. Whether it is the inclination of resources or the preferential treatment of funds, they have played an important role in safeguarding the rights and interests of relevant groups and providing bottom-line guarantees.
Whether it can reap good social effects, whether relevant parties can really spend money wisely, and whether the most "thirst-quenching" policy can benefit the most needy groups are very important links.
Nowadays, at the beginning of the implementation of relevant policies, many localities and departments have the awareness of strictly controlling access and determining the relevant beneficiaries in a fair and prudent manner.
But this is only the first step. It is also indispensable to implement dynamic supervision on relevant groups and establish corresponding adjustment and exit mechanisms.
Only in this way can it be ensured that the relevant policy guarantees are truly "send charcoal in the snow", rather than "icing on the cake" or even "cheating food and drinking", so as to better stimulate the vitality of relevant policies.
It is gratifying that more and more localities and departments have already had such awareness and actions, and are actively committed to improving the dynamic management and exit mechanism.
For example, in 2023, the national subsistence allowance system has adjusted the property and income access conditions of those who enjoy the policy, and has also adopted strict control measures for violations of insurance fraud, and those who do not meet the conditions will be cleaned up in time; in order to optimize the business environment, In some places, enterprises that meet certain conditions will be included in the category of "service green card" enterprises, and corresponding preferential policies will be given. Once the enterprises have such behaviors as causing adverse social impacts and harms, or violating laws and regulations, the corresponding qualifications will be cancelled; civil affairs departments All kinds of subsidies issued to relevant special groups are also increasingly emphasizing the necessity of implementing the annual review system, requiring timely suspension of beneficiaries who do not meet the conditions.
Whether precious resources and policy guarantees can truly benefit the most urgently needed groups is related to the public's sense of gain, social equity, the credibility of the government and related functional departments, and the motivation and confidence of economic and social development.
It should be realized that in reality, there are still phenomena such as dynamic adjustments not being carried out in a timely and effective manner, and exit mechanisms being reduced to "paper" exits.
There are many reasons for this. For example, some leading cadres have the psychology of "fear of trouble" and "don't make trouble for yourself"; The implementation of some dynamic supervision requires the cooperation of multiple departments, the relevant information is difficult to obtain evidence, and the operation is complicated; the corresponding supervision and reporting mechanism is not smooth, and so on.
"Don't worry about scarcity but inequality, and don't worry about poverty but anxiety." From a certain perspective, the precise allocation and virtuous circle of some public policies and resources are also important indicators for measuring local governance capabilities.
When relevant localities and departments implement and promote similar work, they should not be satisfied with the aspects of "looking good on the outside" or "giving it to everyone", but should have more embroidery spirit and more responsibility.
Today, some places have begun to make full use of big data to collect and compare information on relevant policy beneficiaries.
It is expected that with the support of technical means, more places and departments can further strengthen information disclosure and actively accept social supervision, so that the openings for "running and dripping" of relevant policies and benefits will become smaller and smaller, and the "mismatch space" of policy resources will become more and more smaller.
The suggestions on the "leadership message board" are reminders and expectations. I hope that more places and departments can understand the public opinion, and use more powerful and practical measures to dispel the public's concerns and gain satisfaction.
"Worker's Daily" February 21, 2023, version 05