In Strasbourg, the elected PS, LREM leave the city council together

• The last session of the Strasbourg city council ended earlier than expected on Monday evening.

• The reason ?

  The opposition left the scene after the first deputy announced that a resolution would not be put to the vote.

• “The freedom of speech of municipal councilors outside the majority has been constantly reduced since the start of this mandate”, deplores Jean-Philippe Vetter (Les Républicains).

New room, dirty atmosphere.

The first city council in the renovated hemicycle of the administrative center of Strasbourg will be remembered.

Not for the inauguration of the premises but rather because it was marked, extremely rare, by the departure in full session of the opposition.

The three groups, regardless of their political color, all left around 8:45 p.m.

The reason ?

The first deputy mayor Jeanne Barseghian (Europe Ecologie-Les Verts) had just announced that two resolutions would not be put to the vote.

Including that carried by Pierre Jakubowicz (Horizons) on the reopening of museums six days a week, lunchtime included.

"The two texts had been tabled on time, they had not been the subject of any discussion during the meeting of the presidents in the morning and even stated during the agenda... There was no reason that the rules suddenly change”, explains to

Pernelle Richardot (Socialist Party) deploring “a situation which is deteriorating for the opposition”.

" I have never seen that "

Because this is not the first time that the debates are tense between the executive and its opposition.

“They had already done it to me for a resolution in November, and to others”, continues the elected leftist.

“What happened is not an isolated event.

The freedom of speech of municipal councilors outside the majority has been constantly reduced since the beginning of this mandate.

We had to act to say stop, adds, on the opposite side of the political spectrum, Jean-Philippe Vetter (Les Républicains).

I have never seen that.

During the twelve years of Roland Ries [the former socialist mayor], we at least had the floor.

I'm not saying that we convinced him every time, but we could express ourselves.

»

Would the opposition today be if not censured at least ignored?

"There is a permanent tension that I have never known," said former first deputy Alain Fontanel (Renaissance).

It is due to an erratic and authoritarian management of the session by the mayor or the first deputy.

They decide to change the agenda when it bothers them.

»

"It's a tinkering with local democracy," adds Pernelle Richardot, denying a calculated staging of Monday evening's outing.

“Frankly no because we have a concern for the common good and we have not added any.

Let's not forget that we also represent part of the people of Strasbourg and this part is despised today.

»

Why did we leave the City Council meeting?

Press release from the three opposition groups of the City of @strasbourg #Strasbourg pic.twitter.com/OCKMaLBPTJ

— Catherine Trautmann (@CatTrautmann) January 30, 2023

Access to this content has been blocked to respect your choice of consent

By clicking on "

", you accept the deposit of cookies by external services and will thus have access to the content of our partners

I ACCEPT

And to better remunerate 20 Minutes, do not hesitate to accept all cookies, even for one day only, via our "I accept for today" button in the banner below.

More information on the Cookie Management Policy page.

However, after her investiture, Jeanne Barseghian took a step towards the opposition by opening up the possibility of initiating a resolution... "And even if it already exists in other cities, we welcomed this progress.

But now, we have to go to the end of things, ”continues Jean-Philippe Vetter.

“Except that at the same time, the number of municipal councils has gone from 10 to 8 per year, that the second round of speech has disappeared and that now it is also forbidden to react after an interpellation and the response of an elected official!

In short, when the subject bothers them, they do everything to prevent the debate.

»

"A theatrical departure", according to the majority

Rather serious accusations refuted by the group “Strasbourg ecologist and citizen” of Jeanne Barseghian.

In a press release, he explains that the famous resolution at the origin of the chaos "deviated significantly from the spirit of the internal regulations by replacing the municipal executive, which is why we decided not to submit it to the vote. and report it to a plenary committee”.

"This theatrical departure is the culmination of a permanent strategy of part of the opposition to energize the debates which we wish, for our part, to be as peaceful and democratic as possible", writes the majority again.

Monday evening, the mayor had closed the session by repeating her "attachment to the contradictory debate" and calling for "in-depth work on the rules of procedure".

That's good, that's what the opposition regularly asks for.

“But they have been playing the clock for months.

There is a rot.

This is why we wanted to react with a strong gesture, ”reacts Alain Fontanel, who does indeed plan to return to sit.

Like the other protesters.

“We cannot permanently boycott a democratic forum.

»

Strasbourg

Strasbourg renounces its text on the financing of worship

Miscellaneous facts

A woman gives birth earlier than expected on the Paris-Strasbourg train

• Strasbourg

• Great East

• Jean-Philippe Vetter

• Alain Fontanel

• Jeanne Barsegian

• Europe Ecology The Greens (EELV)