Although the Iranian authorities did not confirm the validity of the allegations of American newspapers about Israel's responsibility for the bombing of a facility in Isfahan, the Arab platforms were preoccupied with the incident, doubting the responsibility for the attack, and the nature of the expected Iranian response?

Although the Wall Street Journal quoted US officials as saying that Israel carried out the operation, Israel did not officially announce this, and Tehran remained silent, saying that it would conduct its investigations to determine who was responsible for the attacks.

Perhaps what confirms the validity of the American newspaper's allegations are the statements of the former head of the Mossad to the Israeli Army Radio, in which he said that "the targeted institution in Iran is developing hypersonic missiles, and they will be very fast, to the point that the air defense systems will have difficulty intercepting them."

In turn, Arab activists on social media took different positions towards the attacks that targeted the industrial facility in Isfahan, Iran, as some went to ridicule and apprehend the expected Iranian response, while others saw that the matter was a play that was taking place to divert attention from other, more important issues.

On (30/1/2022), the "Shabakat" program monitored some of these tweets, including a tweet by activist David Yassin, who expected that the Iranian response to the attack would not be against Israel, but rather on civilians in Iraq.

He wrote, "Israel did not reserve the right to respond, but rather hastened to strike the Iranian depth. Likewise, Iran will not strike Israel, but will respond in Iraq by bombing citizens' homes under the pretext of bombing Israeli headquarters."

Mithaq Abdullah believes that what happened is an exchange of roles between Tehran and Tel Aviv, so he wrote, "The bombing of a military facility in the depths of Iran is nothing but explosives, there is no importance to the sites, and these targets only came to divert people's attention from the real goal, which is to silence the demonstrations regardless of About the bomber and the bomber.

While Al-Samnoudi Amr questioned the validity of the targeting and those behind it, he tweeted, "Israel says maybe America, and America says maybe Israel, and Iran doesn't say anything, and it looks like a movie in the end."

On the other hand, Abdullah Saud Al-Daihani saw that celebrating the targeting of Iran is not a matter of chivalry.

An informed Iranian source said in exclusive statements to Al-Jazeera that initial indications suggest that the marches were launched from inside Iran to carry out the attack.

It is worth noting that the drones that targeted the facility are of the "Quad Copter" type, a type known for civilian use and available in the market. The drone is small if it is for filming or monitoring and is the size of a palm, but if it is for offensive purposes, it weighs up to 200 kilograms.

And because these drones are not warlike, they do not fly long distances, but rather the average distance they can travel is 30 kilometers, and they are capable of carrying weapons with limited destructive power such as small bombs.