Obliging an employee to pay 61,000 dirhams that he unlawfully obtained

Abu Dhabi Court ascertained that the employee seized the amount.

archival

The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Cases ruled that an employee must pay an employer 61,388 dirhams, as it was proven that he had received these amounts as undeserved salaries for a period of three months in which he was absent from work.

In her lawsuit, the employer stated that the defendant was working for her, and was absent from work for a period of more than 90 days, and as a result, his services were terminated with her, and accordingly, financial dues amounting to undeserved salaries in his debt amounted to 61 thousand and 388 dirhams.

The representative of the Government Cases Department attended on behalf of the plaintiff, and pleaded that the court does not have jurisdiction to hear the case, and the jurisdiction of the partial court. The simple civil court issued a decision to refer the case to the competent civil department.

When examining the case, the defendant attended and submitted an answer memorandum, at the end of which he sought to reject the case in form and content, and if the plaintiff had documents proving that he had received the sums, she must prove that, and the representative of the Government Cases Department appeared on behalf of the plaintiff and requested a time for the answer, and the representative of the Government Cases Department appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, He requested to reserve the case for judgment.

The court stated that it was proven from the papers that the plaintiff based her case on the basis that the defendant was working for her, and was absent from work for a period of more than 90 days, and that as a result, she terminated his services, and demanded that he pay the sums that he unlawfully took from her, and the plaintiff had attached A statement of the defendant's end-of-service dues, in which it is proven that he owes her the amount.

And she said: “Since the defendant in the present case did not make any defense or defense that undermined the plaintiff’s request, except for what came in his words in the rejoinder memorandum submitted by him, stating that if the plaintiff has documents proving that he received the sums, she must prove that, and since the defendant is legally assigned. Evidence that he did not receive the sums subject of the present case, which is the matter with which the court obliges him to pay what he owes to the plaintiff, and obliges him to pay fees, expenses and attorney’s fees.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news