Cargo Solidarity indefinite general strike... Possibility of deliberation of 'business start order'

<Anchor>

President Yoon Seok-yeol announced that he would review the order to start work for the cargo union, which is on a general strike.

The justification is that a strike by the cargo unions could lead to an economic crisis.

If this strike continues over the weekend, it is said that it will be put on the agenda of the Cabinet meeting and the work order procedure will be followed.

Reporter Park Won-kyung on the sidewalk.

<Reporter>

President Yoon Seok-yeol emphasized through SNS that he would respond to the cargo union strike in accordance with 'law and principle'.

He said that holding the logistics system hostage during a national crisis would not be tolerated by the public, and he said he would also consider a 'commissioning order'.

[Lee Jae-myung/Deputy Spokesperson at the Presidential Office: The cargo union's refusal of collective transport has no justification, and it is an act that betrays the people's expectations for the recovery of the economy and people's livelihood.]

Under the current law, collective cargo transport refusal causes a very serious crisis in the national economy. The Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport can issue a business start order if there is a risk of

A high-ranking government official said, "In terms of various indicators such as the port device rate, there seems to be no problem with the triggering requirements."

However, the key is that it has never been issued since 2004, when the business start order was introduced. It is likely," he said, conveying the forced airflow.

Regarding the expansion of items subject to the safe fare system requested by the cargo union, the President's Office drew a line, saying that items such as steel, automobiles, and parcel delivery have relatively high hourly wages, saying there is no justification.

People's power criticized the request for expansion of target items as a strategic calculation by the cargo union to expand its power, and the Democratic Party turned its arrows to the government and the ruling party, saying that they should engage in dialogue, not intimidating workers, talking about legal responses.