The Sweden Democrats end up outside the government, but have gotten through a lot of policy.

Strongly tightened migration rules are now expected and it will be investigated how more people can be deported from Sweden. 

Anna Lundberg is a professor at Lund and Linköping Universities and an expert on asylum issues.

She is also one of the initiators of the Asylum Commission, which examines shifts in the area of ​​asylum law.

Risks ending up in limbo

Among other things, she criticizes the politicians for not having sufficient knowledge about deportations. 

- For example, it is not the case that all deportation decisions can be carried out, even if the individuals themselves would like to return to their former homeland. 

In many cases, the home country refuses to receive the person, which means that people end up in limbo when they can neither return nor are allowed to stay in Sweden and they are simultaneously excluded from all welfare rights, according to Anna Lundberg.

Critical of "Vandel" formulation

Javascript is disabled

Javascript must be enabled to play video

Read more about browser support

Ulf Kristersson (M) was asked questions about the wording "expulsion due to lack of character" - hear his explanation of the term in the clip.

Photo: Jonas Ekströmer/TT

In the so-called "Tidö agreement" that was presented today, it also appears that the four parties want to see an investigation with the task of further tightening the regulations around deportation due to crime and deportation due to "lack of good conduct".

According to the Tidö Agreement, misconduct can, for example, concern abuse, prostitution and association with a criminal organization. 

- How can you assess that in a democracy?

It sounds like there is room for a lot of discretion and I think SD are aware of that.

It is based on an image that people on the run do not behave and that is not true at all, says Anna Lundberg. 

"Why lock up people on the run?"

Another point that she questions is the idea of ​​introducing transit centers where asylum seekers should be during the asylum process. 

- It is perhaps feasible.

But many wonder why people want to deprive people on the run?

We are not talking about criminals, she says, and continues:

- Such centers are also likely to be very costly for the treasury, it has become so in other countries.

And it has been shown to have very serious consequences for the health of those placed there.

It seems to be about signaling that asylum seekers cannot be trusted and that they must therefore be locked up in some kind of camp.