He took advantage of a legal agency to “break two deposits”

A young man withdraws 100,000 dirhams from his mother's account without her knowledge

The woman put her money in 6 separate bank deposits with the bank, the value of each deposit is 50 thousand dirhams.

archival

A (Gulf) woman filed a lawsuit in Khorfakkan Court, requesting the assignment of a banking expert to move to the headquarters of a national bank to see its electronic system, to find out the person who broke a number of deposits and benefited from her money without her knowledge by reviewing private cameras, after losing 100,000 dirhams.

The details of the lawsuit revealed that her son withdrew the money under a legal power of attorney from his mother without her knowledge.

The lawsuit filed by the court stated that the woman placed her money in six separate bank deposits with the bank, the value of each deposit being 50 thousand dirhams, with a total of 300,000 dirhams, in exchange for annual profits. After a period of repeated deposits, she reviewed the bank to receive the profits of all deposits registered in her name. However, she was surprised that the bank informs her that her total deposits are 200 thousand dirhams.

The plaintiff demanded to review the deposits she made with them and to review the cashier cameras installed in the bank, to find out all her deposits and to recalculate the amounts she deposited in full with a total of 300,000 dirhams, and to calculate her profits.

The court deliberated the case, and the defendant attended his representative and submitted a reply memorandum denying all the plaintiff’s allegations, and that they were merely sent statements lacking evidentiary evidence. The account and several bank deposits were opened, and a table was attached to the number and numbers of deposits, the value of each, the date of deposit, the date of breaking each deposit, and the mechanism for depositing its value into the savings account.

The bank's agent added that the plaintiff disposed of the amounts deposited in her account in the usual manner, and did not object to any of the financial movements based on the savings account belonging to her and her deposits, explaining that the bank denies its preoccupation with any amounts towards the plaintiff, and that all cash deposits are subject to a banking system governed by links Deposit and profits, demanding that the case be dismissed because the plaintiff did not present any evidence that contradicts the evidence in the bank’s books.

The agent attached a statement of the plaintiff's savings account with the bank stating that she had opened several bank deposits through the legal agent (her son), who submitted a request to break two deposits and withdraw the amount earmarked in the plaintiff's savings account.

For its part, the court issued a decision assigning a banking expert to carry out the task, who deposited in his report that the plaintiff has maintained a savings account with the defendant for more than 12 years, and it is still effective until the date of filing the lawsuit. The plaintiff also concluded five investment deposits with the defendant, and that the nature of the transactions It does not exceed withdrawals and deposits and is devoid of any banking facilities.

And he indicated that the bank deposits the profits of all deposits regularly at a rate of every three months, except for the last deposit whose profits were deposited annually. Under a legal power of attorney from his mother, the plaintiff, the value of the two deposits was deposited into the plaintiff's account on the same date of the break, and then the amount was withdrawn.

The court decided to terminate the case, obligating the plaintiff to pay her fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news