China News Service, September 29. According to Yonhap News Agency, South Korean President Yin Xiyue said in an interview with reporters on the 29th that the largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, promoted the removal of Foreign Minister Park Zhen, saying that he believes that the people are well aware of right and wrong.
Data map: South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue.
According to reports, in response to the question, "The Common Democratic Party will submit Park Jin's dismissal to the National Assembly. If it is rejected, it may be difficult to achieve co-governance between the government and the opposition." healthy.
Analysis believes that this statement shows that the Democratic Party's promotion of Park Jin's recall case is not conducive to national interests, and it is difficult to obtain the support of the people. It also euphemistically expresses that Yin Xiyue may exercise the veto power of recall.
According to previous reports, in order to hold President Yin Xiyue accountable for returning empty-handed for the trip to the United States and Canada, the Democratic Party had earlier submitted the proposal to remove Park Jin to the Congress Secretariat.
The proposal for the recall of state councilors must be proposed by more than one third (100 seats) of the current members and approved by more than half (150 seats). The Democratic Party currently has 169 seats in Congress and fully controls the initiative to pass the recall proposal.
On the 27th, Park Jin himself expressed regret that the largest opposition party, the Common Democratic Party, established the opinion on his dismissal as the party's position and submitted it to the National Assembly.
Park Jin said that diplomacy is the "Maginot Line" to defend national interests.
At present, countries around the world are in fierce competition for survival, and the international diplomatic and security environment that South Korea faces is very severe.
Under such circumstances, it is deeply regrettable that the Democratic Party still uses diplomacy as the target of political struggle by virtue of its seat advantage.