A father pays 25 thousand dirhams for a “fake” grant for his daughter

The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims annulled a ruling of the Court of First Instance rejecting a lawsuit filed by another man accused of defrauding him and obtaining an amount of 25 thousand and 420 dirhams in return for his promise to provide a scholarship for his daughter in a state university. requesting.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against another in which he demanded that he pay him 25 thousand and 420 dirhams and a material and moral compensation of 25 thousand dirhams with obligating him to pay fees and expenses, noting that the defendant deceived him to obtain a scholarship for his daughter in one of the state universities and asked him for sums of 25 One thousand and 420 dirhams transferred to him through the exchange, claiming that it was the fees for submitting grant applications, but he was surprised that he was a victim of fraud by the defendant.

During the hearing of the case, the defendant did not attend despite the legal notice, and the court of the first instance decided to reject the case in its case, with the plaintiff obligating the fees and expenses, based on the appellant's inability to prove his case. against him with fees and expenses for the two degrees of litigation.

The appellant lamented the error in the application of the law and the corruption in reasoning, as he decided to dismiss the case based on his inability to prove his case despite his submission of evidence that he had transferred the amounts claimed to the respondent. In the papers, the appellant transferred sums to the appellant to register his daughter at the university, but she was not registered, and the appellant did not see the letters exchanged between him and the appellee, which prove the fact that the amounts were transferred to enroll his daughter in the university, and provided copies of WhatsApp messages exchanged between the appellant and the appellee.

The Court of Appeal stated in the merits of the ruling that what was established from reading the case documents was that the appellant had transferred an amount of 25 thousand and 420 dirhams according to the transfer receipts attached to the papers. It was also confirmed from the police investigations in the criminal case that the funds in the transfers bond were in exchange for the respondent’s registration of the appellant’s daughter at the university, according to what It was submitted from WhatsApp messages between the appellant and the respondent, and it is also proven from the filing order issued in the criminal case that the reason for transferring the amounts in question is so that the respondent takes over the appellant’s registration at the university and payment of fees, and that the penal file was saved due to the lack of fraudulent means.

The court indicated that the appellant did not appear before the Court of First Instance to pay the lawsuit with a payment or to provide evidence that he paid these amounts in return for university fees, or that he implemented the agreement between him and the appellant, which is the matter with which his responsibility is occupied with the amount of the claim.

The court decided to partially annul the ruling of the Court of First Instance in what it had decided to reject the appellant’s request to return the amounts and to rule again by obligating the appellant to pay the appellant an amount of 25 thousand and 420 dirhams and to uphold the appealed ruling otherwise, and obligated the appellant to pay expenses for the two levels of litigation.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news