Obligating an accused to pay 60,000 dirhams for selling a property he does not own

The criminal court convicted the accused of fraudulently seizing the money.

archival

A young man defrauded a man and sold him a property he did not own, and obtained 55 thousand dirhams as a deposit, while the Al-Ain Court of First Instance ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff 60,000 dirhams.

A man filed a lawsuit, in which he demanded to oblige another to pay him 55 thousand dirhams, and oblige him to the amount and capacity of 20 thousand dirhams in compensation for the damages he sustained and the profit he missed from the date of the seizure of the money, as well as fees and expenses and in return for attorney fees, indicating that the defendant He stole from him an amount of 55 thousand dirhams fraudulently, by selling him a property that he had no right to dispose of with his knowledge of this, which led to his deception and forced him to deliver the amount, and he was convicted under a penal judgment, and provided a document for his claim a copy of the penal judgment, and a copy of the agreement A sale and a copy of a bank check, while the defendant did not attend despite his announcement.

For its part, the court clarified in the merits of its judgment that what is proven from reading the copy of the judgment issued in the criminal case is that the defendant was convicted in it of the charge of seizing for himself the amount indicated in the papers and owned by the plaintiff, and that was by using fraudulent means by selling him a property that he had no right to dispose of. And then this criminal judiciary has separated the common basis between the civil and criminal lawsuits and the legal description of them and their attribution to the perpetrator.

The court indicated that what is established from the penal judgment, the case document, is that the amount seized from the plaintiff is 55 thousand dirhams according to the check, pointing out that the defendant’s mistake is fixed, and the damage has resulted in the plaintiff feeling psychological pain and depriving him of the seized amount. The causal relationship between the error and the damage, so the defendant is legally obligated to compensate him for that damage, and the court estimates the compensation due to him with its discretion, and extracting from the circumstances and circumstances of the case in the amount of 5000 dirhams as reparative compensation for all moral damages he suffered, and the court ruled obligating the defendant to pay The plaintiff is entitled to a sum of 60,000 dirhams, in addition to obligating him to pay judicial fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news