A young man deluded his ability to cancel traffic violations

Obligating a suspect accused of impersonating a police employee to pay 11.7 thousand dirhams

The criminal judgment has become final and conclusive by convicting the defendant.

archival

A resident of an Arab country impersonated a police employee, and claimed his ability to cancel traffic violations and violations of the precautionary measures for “Corona”, and seized 10 thousand and 265 dirhams from a young man, after deluding him of his ability to remove the violation of wearing a muzzle and traffic violations against him, and a court ruled Al-Ain of First Instance obligated him to pay the young man an amount of 11,765 dirhams, in addition to a fine of 3,000 dirhams according to a penal ruling.

In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit against a resident, in which he demanded to oblige him to pay him an amount of 10 thousand and 265 dirhams, while obligating him to pay 10 thousand dirhams in compensation for the damages he sustained, noting that the defendant deluded him that he was a police employee, and that he was able to remove His traffic violations and the mask violation, and he received the amount of the claim from him, but he did not fulfill his obligation.

The defendant was convicted of that incident under a criminal judgment for the charge of appropriating the plaintiff's financial sums by using fraudulent methods and taking an incorrect capacity, and was punished with a fine of 3000 dirhams, with obligating him to pay the due fee.

During the preparation of the case, the plaintiff submitted in support of his claim a copy of the judgment issued against the defendant, and a copy of a certificate stating that the penal judgment was not appealed, while the defendant admitted that he was preoccupied with the amount of only 4300 dirhams, and requested a refusal of what exceeded the agreed amount, and the amount of compensation was rejected. 10 thousand dirhams.

For its part, the court clarified in the merits of its ruling, that the evidence from the review of the penal judgment, which has become final and final, is the conviction of the defendant for the charge of seizing for himself the sums of money owned by the plaintiff, and that was using fraudulent methods by deluding him that he is a police employee, and that he is able to remove violations His own traffic and violation of the muzzle, and the illegal act was the subject of this judgment on which the plaintiff relied in his present case, so he possesses in the matter of the common issue between the two lawsuits the validity of the order decided before this court.

The court indicated that the evidence from the papers is the conviction of the defendant for the charge of seizing for himself the amount of 10 thousand and 265 dirhams owned by the plaintiff, and the defendant did not commit to implementing the agreement between him and the plaintiff, and there was nothing to refute or contradict this evidence, and the defendant did not attend the hearings to pay The claim is made by any payment or defense or to provide evidence that he has returned the aforementioned amount to the plaintiff, the matter with which the plaintiff must respond to his request.

Regarding the compensation request, the court confirmed that what was evident from the foregoing was that the defendant imprisoned the plaintiff’s money for a period of time and deprived him of benefiting from it, which is a sufficient reason for the plaintiff to be entitled to compensation in the amount of 1500 dirhams, and the court ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 11,765 dirhams As contained reasons and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news