A man demands a private school of 400,000 dirhams in compensation for his daughter

The Abu Dhabi Court rejected the case for lack of fault.

archival

The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Claims Court rejected the case of the father of a private school student, who demanded that the school pay him, as the natural guardian of his minor daughter, an amount of 400,000 dirhams, as a material and moral compensation for the damage caused to his daughter as a result of the violations issued by it.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against a private school in Abu Dhabi, demanding that it pay him an amount of 400,000 dirhams, material and moral compensation for the damage caused to his daughter as a result of the violations issued by the school. The school’s headquarters, and access to the e-mails exchanged between it and the Cambridge International Examination Center.

He pointed out that in the academic year 2020-2021, his daughter studied some subjects related to the Cambridge University curriculum, after the school gave its instructions to conduct tests through remote communication technology without their attendance, and to take the test by school teachers accredited to the University of Cambridge, and when the results appeared, his daughter was surprised to obtain A grade of A in two subjects, and a B in five other subjects.

He pointed out that at the beginning of the school year, his daughter informed him of a rumor that the results were not true, and the school's desire to obtain other fees to correct the tests, and indeed he went to the school and paid the fees for re-correcting the tests, after an email was sent to him, explaining the amount of fees required for correction, and then He received an email from the Cambridge Center that the results of the first tests were correct, and after submitting several complaints to the Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge, he was responded with a message “that by communicating with the relevant department, we inform you that the procedure is correct, according to the Cambridge Guide,” and that “his daughter sustained material and moral damages.” for her exams to be corrected.” A lawyer for the school filed a reply note, which included images from email correspondence from the University of Cambridge.

The court stated in the merits of the ruling that it is established that the plaintiff filed a complaint with the Department of Education and Knowledge, which in its response stated that the procedure was correct according to the Cambridge Guide, pointing out that the evidence was established for the court, after reviewing all the papers, that the action taken was correct, and then the error is excluded from The school side, and the papers were empty of a document supporting what the plaintiff had called, and the court ruled to reject the case, with the plaintiff obligating the fees and expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news